Zahurkhan Saheb khan vs State of Maharashtra through PSO PS Pandharkawada — 87/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application

CNR: MHYA100008052026

e-Filing Number

12-05-2026

Filing Number

760/2026

Filing Date

13-May-2026

Registration No

87/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division Kelapur

Judge

26-2nd Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kelapur

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 17-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0608

Police Station

P.S.Pandharkawada

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

1.Zahurkhan Saheb khan

Adv. M. R. SYED
2.Nagar Parishad Kondwada Pandharkawada

Adv. M. R. SYED

Respondent(s)

1.State of Maharashtra through PSO PS (Police Station) Pandharkawada
2.Nagar Parishad Kondwada Panhdarkawada

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
16-Jun-2026

Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: OMC No. 87/2026 Decision: The court allowed Zahur Khan's application for interim custody of his seized cattle-transport vehicle (MH-31-CB-6490) under a conditional release order. The vehicle will be held as security throughout the trial, and the applicant must execute a ₹10 lakh indemnity bond and pay ₹600 daily maintenance charges for three cattle before release. Key Reasoning: The court found the applicant is the registered owner with valid documentation, and no confiscation provision exists in law. Keeping the vehicle idle at the police station would cause deterioration; therefore, conditional interim custody is appropriate, with conditions including vehicle non-transfer, production when required, and maintenance payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
16-Jun-2026

Disposed

2nd Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kelapur
15-Jun-2026

Reply/Say

2nd Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kelapur
12-Jun-2026

Reply/Say

2nd Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kelapur
10-Jun-2026

Reply/Say

2nd Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kelapur
08-Jun-2026

Reply/Say

2nd Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kelapur
04-Jun-2026

Reply/Say

2nd Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kelapur
02-Jun-2026

Reply/Say

2nd Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kelapur
26-May-2026

Reply/Say

2nd Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kelapur
25-May-2026

Reply/Say

2nd Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kelapur
22-May-2026

Reply/Say

2nd Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kelapur
19-May-2026

Reply/Say

2nd Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kelapur
15-May-2026

Reply/Say

2nd Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Kelapur
13-May-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
13-May-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 87/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OMC No. 87/2026 Decision: The court allowed Zahur Khan's application for interim custody of his seized cattle-transport vehicle (MH-31-CB-6490) under a conditional release order. The vehicle will be held as security throughout the trial, and the applicant must execute a ₹10 lakh indemnity bond and pay ₹600 daily maintenance charges for three cattle before release. Key Reasoning: The court found the applicant is the registered owner with valid documentation, and no confiscation provision exists in law. Keeping the vehicle idle at the police station would cause deterioration; therefore, conditional interim custody is appropriate, with conditions including vehicle non-transfer, production when required, and maintenance payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.