Baban Kachru Kamble vs None — 201/2023

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section Section8. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 09-Jun-2026

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHYA050059692023

e-Filing Number

03-11-2023

Filing Number

2878/2023

Filing Date

03-Nov-2023

Registration No

201/2023

Registration Date

03-Nov-2023

Court

Civil Judge Senior Division Pusad

Judge

23-Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section Section8

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Baban Kachru Kamble

    Adv. Adv.D.U.Kambale

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.None

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Arguments

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  3. 02-May-2026

    Arguments

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pusad

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pusad

  9. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pusad

  10. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pusad

  11. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pusad

  12. 21-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pusad

  13. 07-Jan-2026

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pusad

  14. 18-Dec-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pusad

  15. 01-Dec-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pusad

  16. 14-Nov-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pusad

  17. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pusad

  18. 06-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pusad

  19. 29-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pusad

  20. 04-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pusad

  21. 20-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pusad

  22. 04-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pusad

  23. 25-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pusad

  24. 17-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  25. 02-May-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  26. 24-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  27. 17-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  28. 16-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  29. 02-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  30. 25-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  31. 05-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  32. 20-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  33. 06-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  34. 22-Jan-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    SUMMARY: The petition filed by the petitioner (Baban v. Sudhit) seeking permission to make corrections/amendments to the written reply in civil proceedings has been allowed/granted. The court permitted the petitioner to make the necessary corrections in the record within 14 days, finding that the amendments would not prejudice the respondent and are necessary for accurate representation of facts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  35. 22-Jan-2025

    Amended W.S.

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  36. 20-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  37. 25-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  38. 06-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  39. 03-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  40. 05-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  41. 22-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  42. 31-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  43. 15-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  44. 28-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  45. 12-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  46. 07-May-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  47. 23-Apr-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  48. 10-Apr-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  49. 20-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  50. 01-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  51. 15-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  52. 30-Jan-2024

    Awaiting Objection

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  53. 16-Jan-2024

    Awaiting Objection

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  54. 19-Dec-2023

    Notification / Publication

    Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad

  55. 10-Nov-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  56. 03-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 201/2023

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The petition filed by the petitioner (Baban v. Sudhit) seeking permission to make corrections/amendments to the written reply in civil proceedings has been allowed/granted. The court permitted the petitioner to make the necessary corrections in the record within 14 days, finding that the amendments would not prejudice the respondent and are necessary for accurate representation of facts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case