P.S. Pusad City vs Kishor Pralhad Jadhav — 2100/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12A. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHYA050035492025

Filing Number

2941/2025

Filing Date

29-Aug-2025

Registration No

2100/2025

Registration Date

29-Aug-2025

Court

Civil Judge Senior Division Pusad

Judge

13-4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 25-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

469

Police Station

P.S.Pusad City

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.S. Pusad City

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kishor Pralhad Jadhav

  2. 2.Vishal Dipak Paradhe

  3. 3.Samir Or Imran Khan Salim Khan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted all three accused under the Mumbai Gambling Prohibition Act, Section 12(a), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the prosecution's sole eyewitness (a panch member) could not establish the gambling offense with certainty, as critical details regarding the amount wagered and purpose of funds remained ambiguous. Consequently, the court ordered the accused's immediate release and return of seized property worth ₹87,000, along with forfeiture of gambling materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Disposed

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  7. 08-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  8. 30-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 29-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2100/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted all three accused under the Mumbai Gambling Prohibition Act, Section 12(a), finding that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the prosecution's sole eyewitness (a panch member) could not establish the gambling offense with certainty, as critical details regarding the amount wagered and purpose of funds remained ambiguous. Consequently, the court ordered the accused's immediate release and return of seized property worth ₹87,000, along with forfeiture of gambling materials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case