State Excise Dept. Pusad vs Vimal Prakash Khillare — 1455/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E,F. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHYA050024102025

Filing Number

2051/2025

Filing Date

23-May-2025

Registration No

1455/2025

Registration Date

23-May-2025

Court

Civil Judge Senior Division Pusad

Judge

16-2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E,F

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Excise Dept. Pusad

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vimal Prakash Khillare

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary The court acquitted the accused Nimel Prakash Khillare of charges under the Mumbai Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for alleged illegal liquor possession and sale. The court found that while the prosecution proved seizure of liquor from the accused's custody (100-liter drum containing jaggery mash, 18-liter liquor, and materials worth ₹5,820), it failed to provide sufficient corroborating evidence—such as chemical analysis reports, independent witness testimony, or documentary proof—to establish that the seized items were intended for sale or that the seized liquid was actually country liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  8. 06-Feb-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  9. 23-Jan-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  10. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  11. 12-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  12. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  13. 17-Oct-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  14. 12-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  15. 08-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  16. 26-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 23-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1455/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court acquitted the accused Nimel Prakash Khillare of charges under the Mumbai Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for alleged illegal liquor possession and sale. The court found that while the prosecution proved seizure of liquor from the accused's custody (100-liter drum containing jaggery mash, 18-liter liquor, and materials worth ₹5,820), it failed to provide sufficient corroborating evidence—such as chemical analysis reports, independent witness testimony, or documentary proof—to establish that the seized items were intended for sale or that the seized liquid was actually country liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case