Shriram Finance Limited Through Mohan Kawduji Gurnule vs Mohamad Akhil Mohamad Rafik — 348/2024
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 36. Status: Steps_Unready. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
Arbitration R.D - Arbitration Execution Darkhast
CNR: MHYA050017452024
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
e-Filing Number
29-04-2024
Filing Number
312/2024
Filing Date
04-05-2024
Registration No
348/2024
Registration Date
04-05-2024
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division Pusad
Judge
23-Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shriram Finance Limited Through Mohan Kawduji Gurnule
Adv. Yawale M.A.
Respondent(s)
Mohamad Akhil Mohamad Rafik
Hearing History
Judge: 23-Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division., Pusad
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Steps_Unready |
| 12-03-2026 | Steps_Unready |
| 14-01-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 19-11-2025 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 23-09-2025 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Summary The court ordered the issuance of a movable property attachment warrant against the debtor (Mo. Akil) under Order 21 Rule 43 of the Civil Procedure Code. The debtor failed to pay the outstanding amount of Rs. 88,274/- as per the judgment dated 31/07/2023 in Civil Case No. 19373/2022, despite receiving multiple notices. Since the debtor did not deposit the amount or file any appeal against the judgment, the court found it justified to attach the debtor's movable property to recover the debt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court ordered the issuance of a movable property attachment warrant against the debtor (Mo. Akil) under Order 21 Rule 43 of the Civil Procedure Code. The debtor failed to pay the outstanding amount of Rs. 88,274/- as per the judgment dated 31/07/2023 in Civil Case No. 19373/2022, despite receiving multiple notices. Since the debtor did not deposit the amount or file any appeal against the judgment, the court found it justified to attach the debtor's movable property to recover the debt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts