Rajiv Radhakrushna Panikar vs Balaji Urban Co Operrative Credit Society Limited Digras — 55/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section Section34,37,38,39. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 17-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHYA050016752024

e-Filing Number

03-05-2024

Filing Number

286/2024

Filing Date

04-May-2024

Registration No

55/2024

Registration Date

04-May-2024

Court

Civil Judge Senior Division Pusad

Judge

13-4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section Section34,37,38,39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajiv Radhakrushna Panikar

    Adv. Wakde P.V.

  2. 2.Santosh Pandurang Bhalerao

    Adv. Wakde P.V.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Balaji Urban Co Operrative Credit Society Limited Digras

  2. 2.Balaji Urban Co Operrative Credit Society Limited Digras Through Recovary Sales Officer

  3. 3.Chanda Sandip Jadhav

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  6. 27-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  7. 05-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  8. 03-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  9. 04-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  10. 09-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  11. 29-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  12. 19-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  13. 16-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  14. 17-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  15. 25-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    6th Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  16. 04-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  17. 13-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  18. 04-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  19. 10-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  20. 13-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  21. 17-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  22. 09-Dec-2024

    Compliance

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  23. 12-Nov-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application to set aside the "No Say" order with costs imposed. The plaintiff had failed to file a written statement despite multiple adjournments, citing reasons of family circumstances and delayed document receipt, which the court found satisfactory given the nature of the money/loan dispute. The plaintiff was ordered to pay ₹300 to defendants and ₹200 to the government as costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  24. 12-Nov-2024

    Compliance

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  25. 05-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  26. 10-Oct-2024

    Reply/Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  27. 05-Oct-2024

    Reply/Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  28. 09-Sep-2024

    Reply/Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  29. 31-Jul-2024

    Reply/Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  30. 29-Jun-2024

    Reply/Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  31. 12-Jun-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad

  32. 06-May-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 04-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 55/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application to set aside the "No Say" order with costs imposed. The plaintiff had failed to file a written statement despite multiple adjournments, citing reasons of family circumstances and delayed document receipt, which the court found satisfactory given the nature of the money/loan dispute. The plaintiff was ordered to pay ₹300 to defendants and ₹200 to the government as costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case