Rajiv Radhakrushna Panikar vs Balaji Urban Co Operrative Credit Society Limited Digras — 55/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section Section34,37,38,39. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHYA050016752024

Hearing

Next Hearing

17th June 2026

e-Filing Number

03-05-2024

Filing Number

286/2024

Filing Date

04-05-2024

Registration No

55/2024

Registration Date

04-05-2024

Court

Civil Judge Senior Division Pusad

Judge

13-4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Pusad

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section Section34,37,38,39

Petitioner(s)

Rajiv Radhakrushna Panikar

Adv. Wakde P.V.

Santosh Pandurang Bhalerao

Adv. Wakde P.V.

Respondent(s)

Balaji Urban Co Operrative Credit Society Limited Digras

Balaji Urban Co Operrative Credit Society Limited Digras Through Recovary Sales Officer

Chanda Sandip Jadhav

Hearing History

Judge: 13-4th Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Pusad

20-04-2026

Hearing

12-03-2026

Hearing

20-02-2026

Hearing

17-02-2026

Hearing

27-01-2026

Hearing

Interim Orders

12-11-2024
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application to set aside the "No Say" order with costs imposed. The plaintiff had failed to file a written statement despite multiple adjournments, citing reasons of family circumstances and delayed document receipt, which the court found satisfactory given the nature of the money/loan dispute. The plaintiff was ordered to pay ₹300 to defendants and ₹200 to the government as costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application to set aside the "No Say" order with costs imposed. The plaintiff had failed to file a written statement despite multiple adjournments, citing reasons of family circumstances and delayed document receipt, which the court found satisfactory given the nature of the money/loan dispute. The plaintiff was ordered to pay ₹300 to defendants and ₹200 to the government as costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Senior Division Pusad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case