State Excise Dept. Pusad vs Amol Ramesh Pande — 157/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 08th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHYA050003102025
Filing Number
270/2025
Filing Date
16-01-2025
Registration No
157/2025
Registration Date
17-01-2025
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division Pusad
Judge
16-2nd JT. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Pusad
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Excise Dept. Pusad
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Amol Ramesh Pande
Hearing History
Judge: 16-2nd JT. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Pusad
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-01-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused Raju Suresh Kukde of charges under Section 65(E) of the Mumbai Prohibition Act. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was unlawfully possessing and selling 8 bottles of country liquor worth approximately ₹280 on December 9, 2023. The court found critical deficiencies in the prosecution's case, including reliance on a single witness, absence of chemical analysis reports, and lack of proper documentation establishing the seized liquid as illicit liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused Raju Suresh Kukde of charges under Section 65(E) of the Mumbai Prohibition Act. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was unlawfully possessing and selling 8 bottles of country liquor worth approximately ₹280 on December 9, 2023. The court found critical deficiencies in the prosecution's case, including reliance on a single witness, absence of chemical analysis reports, and lack of proper documentation establishing the seized liquid as illicit liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts