State Excise Dept. Pusad vs Amol Ramesh Pande — 157/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 08th April 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHYA050003102025

Case disposed

Filing Number

270/2025

Filing Date

16-01-2025

Registration No

157/2025

Registration Date

17-01-2025

Court

Civil Judge Senior Division Pusad

Judge

16-2nd JT. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Pusad

Decision Date

08th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65E

Petitioner(s)

State Excise Dept. Pusad

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Amol Ramesh Pande

Hearing History

Judge: 16-2nd JT. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Pusad

08-04-2026

Disposed

01-04-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

18-02-2026

Evidence

12-01-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

08-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The court acquitted the accused Raju Suresh Kukde of charges under Section 65(E) of the Mumbai Prohibition Act. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was unlawfully possessing and selling 8 bottles of country liquor worth approximately ₹280 on December 9, 2023. The court found critical deficiencies in the prosecution's case, including reliance on a single witness, absence of chemical analysis reports, and lack of proper documentation establishing the seized liquid as illicit liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused Raju Suresh Kukde of charges under Section 65(E) of the Mumbai Prohibition Act. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was unlawfully possessing and selling 8 bottles of country liquor worth approximately ₹280 on December 9, 2023. The court found critical deficiencies in the prosecution's case, including reliance on a single witness, absence of chemical analysis reports, and lack of proper documentation establishing the seized liquid as illicit liquor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Senior Division Pusad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case