P. S. Pusad Rural vs Bebibai Keshav Jadhav — 21/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 24th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHYA050000612025
Filing Number
45/2025
Filing Date
06-Jan-2025
Registration No
21/2025
Registration Date
06-Jan-2025
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division Pusad
Judge
16-2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad
Decision Date
24-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 25-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
844
Police Station
P.S.Pusad Rural
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.P. S. Pusad Rural
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Bebibai Keshav Jadhav
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The court acquitted the accused Babeebai Keshav Jadhav of charges under the Mumbai Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for allegedly possessing and selling 10 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹1,000. The prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt as it produced only one witness, did not conduct chemical analysis of the seized substance, and presented no documentary evidence proving the liquid was illicit alcohol or intended for sale. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Apr-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad
-
21-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad
-
13-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad
-
30-Mar-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad
-
12-Mar-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad
-
23-Feb-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad
-
09-Feb-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad
-
30-Jan-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad
-
23-Jan-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad
-
12-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad
-
21-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad
-
07-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad
-
26-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad
-
14-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad
-
01-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad
-
18-Jul-2025
Evidence
2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad
-
30-Jun-2025
Evidence
2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad
-
19-Jun-2025
N.B.W._Unready
2nd Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad
-
08-Apr-2025
N.B.W._Unready
3rd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.m.f.c., Pusad
-
30-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 21/2025
Summary The court acquitted the accused Babeebai Keshav Jadhav of charges under the Mumbai Prohibition Act Section 65(E) for allegedly possessing and selling 10 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹1,000. The prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt as it produced only one witness, did not conduct chemical analysis of the seized substance, and presented no documentary evidence proving the liquid was illicit alcohol or intended for sale. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts