Dattarao Shivram Sodgir vs Kisan Tukaram Sodgir Advocate - Jadhao R. N. — 2/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section Section39. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHYA050000142025

Evidence

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

e-Filing Number

31-12-2024

Filing Number

3/2025

Filing Date

01-01-2025

Registration No

2/2025

Registration Date

01-01-2025

Court

Civil Judge Senior Division Pusad

Judge

21-Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Pusad

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section Section39
CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section Order39Rule1,2withSection151

Petitioner(s)

Dattarao Shivram Sodgir

Adv. Shaikh S.R.

Respondent(s)

Kisan Tukaram Sodgir Advocate - Jadhao R. N.

Hearing History

Judge: 21-Joint Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and J.M.F.C., Pusad

30-04-2026

Evidence

07-04-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

13-02-2026

Evidence

06-02-2026

Issues

Interim Orders

09-04-2025
Order on T.I.

Case Summary: Dattarao v. Kisan (R.C.S. No. 2/2025) The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant is permanently restrained from demolishing or altering the nature of the disputed house property in Yavatmal district until the final decision in the suit for recovery of possession. The court found the plaintiff had a prima facie case as the owner based on official land records, while the defendant's 2012 purchase agreement lacked proof of valid ownership from the seller. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Dattarao v. Kisan (R.C.S. No. 2/2025) The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant is permanently restrained from demolishing or altering the nature of the disputed house property in Yavatmal district until the final decision in the suit for recovery of possession. The court found the plaintiff had a prima facie case as the owner based on official land records, while the defendant's 2012 purchase agreement lacked proof of valid ownership from the seller. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Judge Senior Division Pusad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case