P. S. Yavatmal City vs Kailas Bapurao Pendor and 1 Advocate - Ingole A.B.Adv. — 1849/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 26th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHYA030058612020
Next Hearing
26th May 2026
Filing Number
5861/2020
Filing Date
16-12-2020
Registration No
1849/2020
Registration Date
16-12-2020
Court
Chief Judicial Magistarte , Yavatmal
Judge
1-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Yavatmal
FIR Details
FIR Number
41
Police Station
P.S.Yavatmal City
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P. S. Yavatmal City
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor (A.P.P.)
Respondent(s)
Kailas Bapurao Pendor and 1 Advocate - Ingole A.B.Adv.
Datta Suresh Linganwar
Adv. Chaush S. Z.Adv.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Yavatmal
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 21-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 03-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 20-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this case (FIR 1849/2020) regarding a stolen vehicle (MH-29-Z-8483), the court examination of the complainant witness (Pranin Sohlal Mundda) was recorded. The complainant testified that his car was stolen from Postal Ground on 05/10/2019, and despite filing complaints with Yavatmal City Police Station, no action was taken initially. The court order dated 04/11/2025 directed that cross-examination of the accused be deferred pending their witness examination, and the investigation remains pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this case (FIR 1849/2020) regarding a stolen vehicle (MH-29-Z-8483), the court examination of the complainant witness (Pranin Sohlal Mundda) was recorded. The complainant testified that his car was stolen from Postal Ground on 05/10/2019, and despite filing complaints with Yavatmal City Police Station, no action was taken initially. The court order dated 04/11/2025 directed that cross-examination of the accused be deferred pending their witness examination, and the investigation remains pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts