Dnyaneshwar Ramrao Devkate vs ICICI Home finance ltd. Advocate - Oswal M.R. Adv. — 74/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 23rd March 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHYA010031242019
Filing Number
2180/2019
Filing Date
21-12-2019
Registration No
74/2019
Registration Date
21-12-2019
Court
District and Session Court , Yavatmal
Judge
24-Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.S.J., Yavatmal
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dnyaneshwar Ramrao Devkate
Adv. Bajaj Anil B. Adv.
Sunanda Dnyaneshwar Devkate
Adv. Sontakke R.D.Adv.
Respondent(s)
ICICI Home finance ltd. Advocate - Oswal M.R. Adv.
IcICI Bank Ltd, Branch Yavatmal through Authorised Signatury Aman Tiwari Yavatmal
Adv. Oswal M.R. Adv.
Smt. Kavita Chandrashekhar Devkate
Adv. Ganjiwale M.A
Yash Chandrashekhar Devkate thr natural guardian Smt. Kavita Chandrashekhar Devkate
Adv. Ganjiwale M.A
Akshada Chandrashekhar Devkate thr natural guardian Smt. Kavita Chandrashekhar Devkate
Adv. Ganjiwale M.A
Hearing History
Judge: 24-Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.S.J., Yavatmal
Disposed
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 21-02-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 07-02-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 13-01-2026 | Dismissal Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed Civil Appeal No. 74/2019 (Dnyaneshwar vs ICICI Home Finance) in default on 23/03/2026. The appellant and his counsel were repeatedly absent despite multiple court opportunities and notices since 2024, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the appeal. Given the case's age (over 5 years) and the High Court's directive to dispose of old cases promptly, the court found dismissal warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court dismissed Civil Appeal No. 74/2019 (Dnyaneshwar vs ICICI Home Finance) in default on 23/03/2026. The appellant and his counsel were repeatedly absent despite multiple court opportunities and notices since 2024, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the appeal. Given the case's age (over 5 years) and the High Court's directive to dispose of old cases promptly, the court found dismissal warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts