The State of Maharashtra Through P. S. Ner vs Manohar Shravan Ade Advocate - Chaudhari P.P. — 137/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74,75(3). Status: List of Witness. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHYA010023672025

List of Witness

Next Hearing

01st July 2026

Filing Number

801/2025

Filing Date

12-11-2025

Registration No

137/2025

Registration Date

13-11-2025

Court

District and Session Court , Yavatmal

Judge

4-District Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Yavatmal

FIR Details

FIR Number

509

Police Station

P.S.Ner

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74,75(3)
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 8,12

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra Through P. S. Ner

Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor (A.P.P.)

Respondent(s)

Manohar Shravan Ade Advocate - Chaudhari P.P.

Hearing History

Judge: 4-District Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Yavatmal

08-04-2026

List of Witness

27-03-2026

Appearance

25-03-2026

Production of Accused

12-03-2026

Production of Accused

26-02-2026

Production of Accused

Interim Orders

07-01-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: Bail application of Manohar Ade under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is rejected. The accused is alleged to have exposed his private parts to three teenage girls aged 17-18 years at a bus stand and made obscene gestures. The Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal found the allegations serious in nature and held the accused does not deserve bail due to witness intimidation risk and likelihood of crime recurrence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Bail application of Manohar Ade under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is rejected. The accused is alleged to have exposed his private parts to three teenage girls aged 17-18 years at a bus stand and made obscene gestures. The Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal found the allegations serious in nature and held the accused does not deserve bail due to witness intimidation risk and likelihood of crime recurrence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court , Yavatmal All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case