Anuj Devanand Pawar Through natural guardian mother Sonali Devanand Pawar vs None — 247/2025

Case under Guardians and Wards Act Section 8. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHYA010023232025

e-Filing Number

07-11-2025

Filing Number

1567/2025

Filing Date

07-Nov-2025

Registration No

247/2025

Registration Date

14-Nov-2025

Court

District and Session Court , Yavatmal

Judge

24-Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Guardians and Wards Act Section 8

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anuj Devanand Pawar Through natural guardian mother Sonali Devanand Pawar

    Adv. RATHOD NIRANJAN NARAYAN

  2. 2.Divesh Devanand Pawar Through natural guardian mother Sonali Devanand Pawar

    Adv. RATHOD NIRANJAN NARAYAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.None

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Ad-hoc District Judge-1, Yavatmal rejected the mother's application for court permission to sell her minor sons' undivided property interest. The court held that Sections 29 and 31 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 do not apply to minors' undivided interests in joint family property, as natural guardians retain customary powers under personal law to deal with such interests without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  5. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Public Notice/Proclamation

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  7. 15-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 07-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 247/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Ad-hoc District Judge-1, Yavatmal rejected the mother's application for court permission to sell her minor sons' undivided property interest. The court held that Sections 29 and 31 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 do not apply to minors' undivided interests in joint family property, as natural guardians retain customary powers under personal law to deal with such interests without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case