Niranjan alies Virendra Maroti Parache vs The State of Maharashtra through P. S. Ghatanji Advocate - DGP Smt. Niti N Dave — 37/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Appeal - Criminal Appeal

CNR: MHYA010022122025

e-Filing Number

15-10-2025

Filing Number

748/2025

Filing Date

15-Oct-2025

Registration No

37/2025

Registration Date

17-Oct-2025

Court

District and Session Court , Yavatmal

Judge

18-District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Niranjan alies Virendra Maroti Parache

    Adv. Rajesh Chavhan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra through P. S. Ghatanji Advocate - DGP Smt. Niti N Dave

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Additional Sessions Judge upheld the lower court's conviction of the accused under IPC Section 354 (outraging a woman's modesty) based primarily on the victim's credible and consistent testimony, rejecting the defense's claims of false implicate motivated by enmity over a business transaction. The appellate court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the one-year rigorous imprisonment plus ₹3,000 fine sentence, finding that conviction can be based on sole testimony in sexual offences when the victim's account is reliable and prompt reporting corroborates the charge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  6. 20-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  10. 21-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  11. 11-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  12. 19-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  13. 29-Oct-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  14. 29-Oct-2025

    R and P Ready

    District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  15. 27-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 15-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 37/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge upheld the lower court's conviction of the accused under IPC Section 354 (outraging a woman's modesty) based primarily on the victim's credible and consistent testimony, rejecting the defense's claims of false implicate motivated by enmity over a business transaction. The appellate court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the one-year rigorous imprisonment plus ₹3,000 fine sentence, finding that conviction can be based on sole testimony in sexual offences when the victim's account is reliable and prompt reporting corroborates the charge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case