Niranjan alies Virendra Maroti Parache vs The State of Maharashtra through P. S. Ghatanji Advocate - DGP Smt. Niti N Dave — 37/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th April 2026.
Cri.Appeal - Criminal Appeal
CNR: MHYA010022122025
e-Filing Number
15-10-2025
Filing Number
748/2025
Filing Date
15-10-2025
Registration No
37/2025
Registration Date
17-10-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Yavatmal
Judge
18-District Judge-1 and A.S.J., Yavatmal
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Niranjan alies Virendra Maroti Parache
Adv. Rajesh Chavhan
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra through P. S. Ghatanji Advocate - DGP Smt. Niti N Dave
Hearing History
Judge: 18-District Judge-1 and A.S.J., Yavatmal
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 30-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge upheld the lower court's conviction of the accused under IPC Section 354 (outraging a woman's modesty) based primarily on the victim's credible and consistent testimony, rejecting the defense's claims of false implicate motivated by enmity over a business transaction. The appellate court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the one-year rigorous imprisonment plus ₹3,000 fine sentence, finding that conviction can be based on sole testimony in sexual offences when the victim's account is reliable and prompt reporting corroborates the charge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Additional Sessions Judge upheld the lower court's conviction of the accused under IPC Section 354 (outraging a woman's modesty) based primarily on the victim's credible and consistent testimony, rejecting the defense's claims of false implicate motivated by enmity over a business transaction. The appellate court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the one-year rigorous imprisonment plus ₹3,000 fine sentence, finding that conviction can be based on sole testimony in sexual offences when the victim's account is reliable and prompt reporting corroborates the charge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts