Niranjan alies Virendra Maroti Parache vs The State of Maharashtra through P. S. Ghatanji Advocate - DGP Smt. Niti N Dave — 37/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th April 2026.

Cri.Appeal - Criminal Appeal

CNR: MHYA010022122025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

15-10-2025

Filing Number

748/2025

Filing Date

15-10-2025

Registration No

37/2025

Registration Date

17-10-2025

Court

District and Session Court , Yavatmal

Judge

18-District Judge-1 and A.S.J., Yavatmal

Decision Date

08th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415

Petitioner(s)

Niranjan alies Virendra Maroti Parache

Adv. Rajesh Chavhan

Respondent(s)

The State of Maharashtra through P. S. Ghatanji Advocate - DGP Smt. Niti N Dave

Hearing History

Judge: 18-District Judge-1 and A.S.J., Yavatmal

08-04-2026

Disposed

06-04-2026

Judgment

30-03-2026

Arguments

20-03-2026

Arguments

18-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

08-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

The Additional Sessions Judge upheld the lower court's conviction of the accused under IPC Section 354 (outraging a woman's modesty) based primarily on the victim's credible and consistent testimony, rejecting the defense's claims of false implicate motivated by enmity over a business transaction. The appellate court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the one-year rigorous imprisonment plus ₹3,000 fine sentence, finding that conviction can be based on sole testimony in sexual offences when the victim's account is reliable and prompt reporting corroborates the charge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge upheld the lower court's conviction of the accused under IPC Section 354 (outraging a woman's modesty) based primarily on the victim's credible and consistent testimony, rejecting the defense's claims of false implicate motivated by enmity over a business transaction. The appellate court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the one-year rigorous imprisonment plus ₹3,000 fine sentence, finding that conviction can be based on sole testimony in sexual offences when the victim's account is reliable and prompt reporting corroborates the charge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court , Yavatmal All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case