The State of Maharashtra through P. S. Wadki vs Prakash Natthuji Deharkar — 97/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 353,332,504. Status: Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. Next hearing 25-May-2026 this date has passed

Sessions Case

CNR: MHYA010018842025

Filing Number

643/2025

Filing Date

29-Aug-2025

Registration No

97/2025

Registration Date

02-Sep-2025

Court

District and Session Court , Yavatmal

Judge

24-Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

Last updated 25-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

563

Police Station

P.S.Wadki

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 353,332,504

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra through P. S. Wadki

    Adv. APP Shri Pande U.K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prakash Natthuji Deharkar

Case History

  1. 25-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-May-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  5. 31-Mar-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  9. 07-Feb-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  10. 22-Jan-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

    This is a Session Case No. 97/2025 from the Additional Sessions Court, Yavatmal, involving the State v. Prakash Nathhuji Dehakr (accused). The document records the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of a prosecution witness (Police Head Constable) regarding the complainant's statement and case documents. The cross-examination challenges the witness's credibility on procedural matters including how the statement was recorded, whether proper signatures were obtained, and allegations of false testimony. The court's final order (dated 22/01/2026) notes "Cross-examination completed" with "Nothing further" stated by the prosecution, and the proceeding appears to be a continuation of trial evidence recording without a final verdict announced in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  12. 20-Jan-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  13. 20-Jan-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  14. 20-Jan-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  15. 20-Jan-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  16. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  17. 14-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  18. 26-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  19. 24-Dec-2025

    Fixing date of Hearing

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  20. 29-Nov-2025

    Filing of Surety

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  21. 30-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  22. 08-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 29-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 97/2025

casestatus.in Summary

This is a Session Case No. 97/2025 from the Additional Sessions Court, Yavatmal, involving the State v. Prakash Nathhuji Dehakr (accused). The document records the examination-in-chief and cross-examination of a prosecution witness (Police Head Constable) regarding the complainant's statement and case documents. The cross-examination challenges the witness's credibility on procedural matters including how the statement was recorded, whether proper signatures were obtained, and allegations of false testimony. The court's final order (dated 22/01/2026) notes "Cross-examination completed" with "Nothing further" stated by the prosecution, and the proceeding appears to be a continuation of trial evidence recording without a final verdict announced in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case