State of Mah. P.S.O. Parwa vs Yashwant Jangu Ade Advocate - Agame R.B. — 90/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,366(A),376(2)(N),376(3),354. Status: Fixing date of Hearing. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHYA010016332023
Next Hearing
06th July 2026
Filing Number
575/2023
Filing Date
15-07-2023
Registration No
90/2023
Registration Date
15-07-2023
Court
District and Session Court , Yavatmal
Judge
4-District Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Yavatmal
FIR Details
FIR Number
285
Police Station
P.S.Parwa.
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Mah. P.S.O. Parwa
Adv. A.P.P. Shri S.A. Darda
Respondent(s)
Yashwant Jangu Ade Advocate - Agame R.B.
XXXXXXX
Adv. Agame R.B.
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Yavatmal
Fixing date of Hearing
Fixing date of Hearing
Fixing date of Hearing
Fixing date of Hearing
Fixing date of Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Fixing date of Hearing |
| 12-03-2026 | Fixing date of Hearing |
| 19-01-2026 | Fixing date of Hearing |
| 11-12-2025 | Fixing date of Hearing |
| 11-11-2025 | Fixing date of Hearing |
Interim Orders
Case Summary The Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal allowed the application for release of a seized motorcycle (MH-29/X-3856) to accused Yashwant Jangu Ade. The motorcycle was seized in a serious crime case involving charges under IPC sections 376, 376(2) and POCSO Act sections 3, 4, 7, 8. The court released the vehicle on an indemnity bond of Rs. 80,000 with strict conditions prohibiting sale, transfer, or alteration of the vehicle, and requiring its production as directed by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal allowed the application for release of a seized motorcycle (MH-29/X-3856) to accused Yashwant Jangu Ade. The motorcycle was seized in a serious crime case involving charges under IPC sections 376, 376(2) and POCSO Act sections 3, 4, 7, 8. The court released the vehicle on an indemnity bond of Rs. 80,000 with strict conditions prohibiting sale, transfer, or alteration of the vehicle, and requiring its production as directed by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts