The State of Maharashtra vs Pawan Manoj Kurve Advocate - A. P. Sable — 94/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354D,354B,341,506(2),427,323. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 30th March 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHYA010014332020
Filing Number
536/2020
Filing Date
02-11-2020
Registration No
94/2020
Registration Date
02-11-2020
Court
District and Session Court , Yavatmal
Judge
4-District Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Yavatmal
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
981
Police Station
P.S.Yavatmal City
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P. Shri S.A. Darda
Respondent(s)
Pawan Manoj Kurve Advocate - A. P. Sable
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Yavatmal
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-12-2025 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Special Court at Yavatmal acquitted accused Pawan Manoj Kurve of all charges under IPC sections 427, 341, 323, 506, 354-A, 354-D and POCSO Act Section 12, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court cited substantial contradictions in the victim's testimony, lack of corroborating evidence, missing medical documentation of alleged injuries, and no photographs of alleged vehicle damage, rendering the evidence insufficient to establish the accused's culpability in the alleged harassment and assault incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Special Court at Yavatmal acquitted accused Pawan Manoj Kurve of all charges under IPC sections 427, 341, 323, 506, 354-A, 354-D and POCSO Act Section 12, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court cited substantial contradictions in the victim's testimony, lack of corroborating evidence, missing medical documentation of alleged injuries, and no photographs of alleged vehicle damage, rendering the evidence insufficient to establish the accused's culpability in the alleged harassment and assault incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts