Mirza Zafar Baig Mirza Hatam Baig and 2 vs The State of MaharashtraP. S. Yavatmal City Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor (A.P.P.) — 138/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 29th May 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHYA010010722026
e-Filing Number
18-05-2026
Filing Number
357/2026
Filing Date
18-May-2026
Registration No
138/2026
Registration Date
18-May-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Yavatmal
Judge
18-District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
Decision Date
29-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
365
Police Station
P.S.Yavatmal City
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mirza Zafar Baig Mirza Hatam Baig and 2
Adv. KHILJI NASIR NAJMODDIN
-
2.Shaikh Naved Shaikh Nazim
Adv. KHILJI NASIR NAJMODDIN
-
3.Jishan Ahemad Samir Sheikh
Adv. KHILJI NASIR NAJMODDIN
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of MaharashtraP. S. Yavatmal City Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor (A.P.P.)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-May-2026
Order on Exhibit
Case Summary: Cril. Bail Appln. No. 138/2026 The Yavatmal Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail application of Mirza Zafar Baig and two co-accused, charged with assault using sharp objects under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Although the applicants argued false implication and lack of specific evidence, the court found prima facie medical evidence of serious injury (lacerated and chop wounds) that contradicted claims of false implication, and noted ongoing investigation with risk of witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-May-2026
Disposed
District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
26-May-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
22-May-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
19-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 138/2026
Case Summary: Cril. Bail Appln. No. 138/2026 The Yavatmal Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail application of Mirza Zafar Baig and two co-accused, charged with assault using sharp objects under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Although the applicants argued false implication and lack of specific evidence, the court found prima facie medical evidence of serious injury (lacerated and chop wounds) that contradicted claims of false implication, and noted ongoing investigation with risk of witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts