Rajesh Shriram Meshram vs Sau. Kusum Dhanraj Shende Advocate - Chaudhari P J — 138/2023
Case under Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act Section 15. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHYA010010542023
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
677/2023
Filing Date
04-05-2023
Registration No
138/2023
Registration Date
06-05-2023
Court
District and Session Court , Yavatmal
Judge
4-District Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Yavatmal
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajesh Shriram Meshram
Adv. Chaudhary A D Adv.
Sau. Varsha Rajesh Meshram
Adv. Chaudhary A D Adv.
Respondent(s)
Sau. Kusum Dhanraj Shende Advocate - Chaudhari P J
The Cheif Executive, N.P. Yavatmal
Adv. Sable Rajesh P. Adv.
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Yavatmal
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 28-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-04-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The District Judge, Yavatmal allowed the application filed by respondent No.1 seeking to set aside the "without written statement" order dated 03/01/2024 and file a written statement on record. The court found that the delay in filing was due to the respondent's illness and was not deliberate, and accepting the written statement would facilitate a merit-based decision in the adoption-deed cancellation case. The written statement was accepted on record and marked as Exhibit 24. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District Judge, Yavatmal allowed the application filed by respondent No.1 seeking to set aside the "without written statement" order dated 03/01/2024 and file a written statement on record. The court found that the delay in filing was due to the respondent's illness and was not deliberate, and accepting the written statement would facilitate a merit-based decision in the adoption-deed cancellation case. The written statement was accepted on record and marked as Exhibit 24. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts