Akshay Alias Danny Vinod Sureshakar vs The State of Maharashtra through P.S. Wadgaon Road Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor (A.P.P.) — 126/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 26th May 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHYA010010172026
e-Filing Number
07-05-2026
Filing Number
329/2026
Filing Date
08-May-2026
Registration No
126/2026
Registration Date
08-May-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Yavatmal
Judge
18-District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
Decision Date
26-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
481
Police Station
Awadhutwadi
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Akshay Alias Danny Vinod Sureshakar
Adv. SYED SHAHRUK SYED AKIL
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra through P.S. Wadgaon Road Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor (A.P.P.)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-May-2026
Order on Exhibit
The Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal granted anticipatory bail to Akshay alias Danny Vinod Sureshakar in Crime No. 481/2026 for charges including unlawful assembly, intimidation to kill, and attempt to kill. The court found that while co-accused entered the victim's house with knives, the applicant's direct role was limited to joint intimidation, without overt criminal acts. Bail was granted on a Rs. 40,000 personal recognizance bond with surety, conditioned on weekly police station attendance and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-May-2026
Disposed
District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
25-May-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
19-May-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
08-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 126/2026
The Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal granted anticipatory bail to Akshay alias Danny Vinod Sureshakar in Crime No. 481/2026 for charges including unlawful assembly, intimidation to kill, and attempt to kill. The court found that while co-accused entered the victim's house with knives, the applicant's direct role was limited to joint intimidation, without overt criminal acts. Bail was granted on a Rs. 40,000 personal recognizance bond with surety, conditioned on weekly police station attendance and cooperation with investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts