The State of Maharashtra through P. S. Ner vs Shrikrushna Govind Devagade Advocate - Meshram N.B.Adv. — 39/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109. Status: Production of Accused. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHYA010009572025
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
296/2025
Filing Date
21-04-2025
Registration No
39/2025
Registration Date
21-04-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Yavatmal
Judge
4-District Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Yavatmal
FIR Details
FIR Number
14
Police Station
P.S.Ner
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra through P. S. Ner
Adv. A.P.P. Shri V.S. Telang
Respondent(s)
Shrikrushna Govind Devagade Advocate - Meshram N.B.Adv.
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Yavatmal
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-05-2026 | Production of Accused |
| 06-05-2026 | Production of Accused |
| 22-04-2026 | Production of Accused |
| 08-04-2026 | Production of Accused |
| 31-03-2026 | Production of Accused |
Interim Orders
Summary: The bail application of Shrikrushna Devagade under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been rejected. The accused is charged with assaulting two persons with an axe, causing serious chop wounds and incised injuries to vital body parts. The court found the offense serious in nature and noted that since the injured persons are relatives of the accused, there is risk of witness tampering if he is released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The bail application of Shrikrushna Devagade under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been rejected. The accused is charged with assaulting two persons with an axe, causing serious chop wounds and incised injuries to vital body parts. The court found the offense serious in nature and noted that since the injured persons are relatives of the accused, there is risk of witness tampering if he is released on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts