State of Maharashtra PSO Ghatanji vs Subhash @ Golu Vithhal Pawar Advocate - LADC Chief Adv. S.T. Kulkarni — 33/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376,376(2)(N),376(AB),506. Status: Awaiting Muddemal. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHYA010009162024

Awaiting Muddemal

Next Hearing

02nd June 2026

Filing Number

316/2024

Filing Date

03-05-2024

Registration No

33/2024

Registration Date

03-05-2024

Court

District and Session Court , Yavatmal

Judge

18-District Judge-1 and A.S.J., Yavatmal

FIR Details

FIR Number

178

Police Station

P.S. Ghatanji.

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 376,376(2)(N),376(AB),506
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4,6,12

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra PSO Ghatanji

Adv. A.P.P. Shri S.A. Darda

Respondent(s)

Subhash @ Golu Vithhal Pawar Advocate - LADC Chief Adv. S.T. Kulkarni

Hearing History

Judge: 18-District Judge-1 and A.S.J., Yavatmal

19-05-2026

Awaiting Muddemal

05-05-2026

Awaiting Muddemal

21-04-2026

Awaiting Muddemal

07-04-2026

Awaiting Muddemal

24-03-2026

Awaiting Muddemal

Interim Orders

16-04-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The appeal by Naresh Raibhanji Rodge and Aruna Naresh Rodge against a Domestic Violence Act order was allowed with merit. The court found that the trial court failed to establish the existence of a domestic relationship, which is essential for invoking the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and noted that the marriage was dissolved by court decree in 1996. An interim stay on execution of the order in PWDVA No.8/2021 was granted, and a show cause notice was issued to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The appeal by Naresh Raibhanji Rodge and Aruna Naresh Rodge against a Domestic Violence Act order was allowed with merit. The court found that the trial court failed to establish the existence of a domestic relationship, which is essential for invoking the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and noted that the marriage was dissolved by court decree in 1996. An interim stay on execution of the order in PWDVA No.8/2021 was granted, and a show cause notice was issued to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court , Yavatmal All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case