State of Maharashtra vs Inayat Ali Irfan Ali ad other 2 Advocate - LADC Adv. H. D. Deshmukh — 47/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,34. Status: Filing of Surety. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHYA010008182020
Next Hearing
02nd July 2026
Filing Number
259/2020
Filing Date
12-06-2020
Registration No
47/2020
Registration Date
12-06-2020
Court
District and Session Court , Yavatmal
Judge
18-District Judge-1 and A.S.J., Yavatmal
FIR Details
FIR Number
76
Police Station
P.S.Yavatmal City
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Inayat Ali Irfan Ali ad other 2 Advocate - LADC Adv. H. D. Deshmukh
Irfan Ali @ Irfan Lendi Barkat Ali
Vishal Krushna Ramteke(Abated)
Hearing History
Judge: 18-District Judge-1 and A.S.J., Yavatmal
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Filing of Surety |
| 12-03-2026 | Filing of Surety |
| 10-02-2026 | Filing of Surety |
| 06-01-2026 | Filing of Surety |
| 11-11-2025 | Filing of Surety |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The bail application of Inayat Ali Irfan Ali under Section 439 CrPC was ALLOWED. The court granted bail on personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with surety in the like amount for offences under IPC Section 324 read with 34 and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(2)(va). The court found that charges were not capital offences, investigation was complete, no exceptional factors indicated flight risk, and conditions could address prosecution concerns about witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The bail application of Inayat Ali Irfan Ali under Section 439 CrPC was ALLOWED. The court granted bail on personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with surety in the like amount for offences under IPC Section 324 read with 34 and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(2)(va). The court found that charges were not capital offences, investigation was complete, no exceptional factors indicated flight risk, and conditions could address prosecution concerns about witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts