State of Maharashtra thr. P.S.Yavatmal City vs Kiran Bhagawan Khadase and other 4 Advocate - Chavhan R S Adv. — 49/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,120B,34. Status: N.B.W._Ready. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHYA010008002019
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
Filing Number
230/2019
Filing Date
19-03-2019
Registration No
49/2019
Registration Date
19-03-2019
Court
District and Session Court , Yavatmal
Judge
18-District Judge-1 and A.S.J., Yavatmal
FIR Details
FIR Number
1219
Police Station
P.S.Yavatmal City
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra thr. P.S.Yavatmal City
Adv. APP Chandreshekhar Rambhau Dahe
Respondent(s)
Kiran Bhagawan Khadase and other 4 Advocate - Chavhan R S Adv.
Sachin Manoharrao Mahalle
Adv. Chavan R. S.Adv.
Sandesh @ Babu Bhimrao Tayade
Adv. Chavhan R S Adv.
Mithun @ Bhim Shivaji Khade
Adv. Ali S. M.Adv.
Gajanan Ramkrush Kumare
Adv. Ali S. M.Adv.
Hearing History
Judge: 18-District Judge-1 and A.S.J., Yavatmal
N.B.W._Ready
N.B.W._Ready
N.B.W._Ready
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-05-2026 | N.B.W._Ready |
| 23-04-2026 | N.B.W._Ready |
| 12-03-2026 | N.B.W._Ready |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 22-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application (Exh.98) is allowed. The Sessions Court of Yavatmal granted interim custody of the seized Samsung mobile to accused No.4 Mithun until the case decision, based on his valid purchase receipt and ownership. The accused must execute a supurtnama bond of Rs. 20,000 and comply with conditions including: not selling or transferring the mobile, producing it in court when required, and not altering its nature or color. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application (Exh.98) is allowed. The Sessions Court of Yavatmal granted interim custody of the seized Samsung mobile to accused No.4 Mithun until the case decision, based on his valid purchase receipt and ownership. The accused must execute a supurtnama bond of Rs. 20,000 and comply with conditions including: not selling or transferring the mobile, producing it in court when required, and not altering its nature or color. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts