PALLAVI RAMDAS KORAMKAR vs GOLU SAYED FARUQUE SAYED KALIM — 46/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Awaiting Notice. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition
CNR: MHYA010006092025
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
e-Filing Number
08-03-2025
Filing Number
426/2025
Filing Date
12-03-2025
Registration No
46/2025
Registration Date
20-03-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Yavatmal
Judge
24-Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.S.J., Yavatmal
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PALLAVI RAMDAS KORAMKAR
Adv. MOHAN RAMDASJI GIRATKAR
RAMDAS KISANRAO KORAMKAR
Adv. MOHAN RAMDASJI GIRATKAR
Respondent(s)
GOLU SAYED FARUQUE SAYED KALIM
AKRAM KHAN AKBAR KHAN
Reliance General Insurance Company Limited
Hearing History
Judge: 24-Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.S.J., Yavatmal
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
Awaiting Notice
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 27-04-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 25-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 12-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
| 10-02-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a Sessions Court judgment in Session Case No. 34/2020 from Yavatmal, Maharashtra, dated 04/05/2026. The court examined testimonies from a prosecution witness (police officer) and cross-examination by the defense counsel regarding criminal charges against the accused. The court accepted the prosecution's case as credible and dismissed the defense arguments, finding the witness testimony reliable and rejecting the defense claim that the witness gave false evidence under pressure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a Sessions Court judgment in Session Case No. 34/2020 from Yavatmal, Maharashtra, dated 04/05/2026. The court examined testimonies from a prosecution witness (police officer) and cross-examination by the defense counsel regarding criminal charges against the accused. The court accepted the prosecution's case as credible and dismissed the defense arguments, finding the witness testimony reliable and rejecting the defense claim that the witness gave false evidence under pressure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts