Himalay Kailas Thakre vs The State of Maharashtra through P.S. Yavatmal Rural Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor (A.P.P.) — 61/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--BAIL REFUSED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHYA010005842026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

165/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

61/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Yavatmal

Judge

18-District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--BAIL REFUSED

Last updated 25-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0155

Police Station

P.S.Yavatmal Rural

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Himalay Kailas Thakre

    Adv. Tagale A. J.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra through P.S. Yavatmal Rural Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor (A.P.P.)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court rejected the bail application of Himalay Thakare, accused under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (rape by false promise of marriage). The court found that the applicant prima facie did not intend to marry the victim from the beginning, making the cited precedents inapplicable, and concluded the offense was serious with investigation ongoing. Consequently, bail was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 61/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail application of Himalay Thakare, accused under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (rape by false promise of marriage). The court found that the applicant prima facie did not intend to marry the victim from the beginning, making the cited precedents inapplicable, and concluded the offense was serious with investigation ongoing. Consequently, bail was denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case