The State of Maharashtra vs Maroti Harbaji Arade and 02 Advocate - Deshmukh I N Adv. — 43/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,34. Status: Fixing date of Hearing. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHYA010005452021
Next Hearing
06th July 2026
Filing Number
214/2021
Filing Date
23-04-2021
Registration No
43/2021
Registration Date
23-04-2021
Court
District and Session Court , Yavatmal
Judge
18-District Judge-1 and A.S.J., Yavatmal
FIR Details
FIR Number
40
Police Station
P.S.Kalamb
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P. Shri V.S. Telang
Respondent(s)
Maroti Harbaji Arade and 02 Advocate - Deshmukh I N Adv.
Nitesh Gulabrao Karluke
Adv. Deshmukh I N Adv.
Smt. Mandabai Namdeo Pandam
Adv. Tagale A. J.
Hearing History
Judge: 18-District Judge-1 and A.S.J., Yavatmal
Fixing date of Hearing
Fixing date of Hearing
Fixing date of Hearing
Fixing date of Hearing
Fixing date of Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Fixing date of Hearing |
| 12-03-2026 | Fixing date of Hearing |
| 22-01-2026 | Fixing date of Hearing |
| 18-12-2025 | Fixing date of Hearing |
| 09-10-2025 | Fixing date of Hearing |
Interim Orders
BAIL GRANTED The Additional Sessions Judge allowed the second bail application of accused Maroti Harbaji Arade in a murder case under IPC §302 r/w §34 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, §3(2)(v). The court found the parity principle applicable, as the accused's role (assault with stick) was less severe than his co-accused (assault with sickle) who had been released on bail by the High Court. Arade was released on Rs.50,000 personal bond with a surety, subject to conditions including a restriction from entering village Warha and not tampering with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
BAIL GRANTED The Additional Sessions Judge allowed the second bail application of accused Maroti Harbaji Arade in a murder case under IPC §302 r/w §34 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, §3(2)(v). The court found the parity principle applicable, as the accused's role (assault with stick) was less severe than his co-accused (assault with sickle) who had been released on bail by the High Court. Arade was released on Rs.50,000 personal bond with a surety, subject to conditions including a restriction from entering village Warha and not tampering with evidence or witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts