Badal Aalesh Rathod vs The State of Maharashtra through P. S. Parwa Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor (A.P.P.) — 53/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHYA010005322026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
140/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
53/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Yavatmal
Judge
4-District Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Yavatmal
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
358
Police Station
P.S.Parwa.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Badal Aalesh Rathod
Adv. JAULKAR SANJAY RAMBHAU
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra through P. S. Parwa Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor (A.P.P.)
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Yavatmal
Disposed
Hearing
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 04-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 27-02-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Court of Sessions, Yavatmal granted bail to accused Badal Aalesh Rathod in a kidnapping case under the principle that "bail is a rule and jail an exception." The court found the relationship between the accused and victim was consensual, the victim was of adult age and not a minor, and importantly, both the informant and victim had no objection to his release. The court imposed bail conditions including a personal recognizance of Rs. 50,000 with a surety of equal amount and restrictions against intimidating witnesses or committing similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Court of Sessions, Yavatmal granted bail to accused Badal Aalesh Rathod in a kidnapping case under the principle that "bail is a rule and jail an exception." The court found the relationship between the accused and victim was consensual, the victim was of adult age and not a minor, and importantly, both the informant and victim had no objection to his release. The court imposed bail conditions including a personal recognizance of Rs. 50,000 with a surety of equal amount and restrictions against intimidating witnesses or committing similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts