Badal Aalesh Rathod vs The State of Maharashtra through P. S. Parwa Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor (A.P.P.) — 53/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHYA010005322026
e-Filing Number
26-02-2026
Filing Number
140/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
53/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Yavatmal
Judge
4-District Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Yavatmal
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 25-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
358
Police Station
P.S.Parwa.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Badal Aalesh Rathod
Adv. JAULKAR SANJAY RAMBHAU
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra through P. S. Parwa Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor (A.P.P.)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Court of Sessions, Yavatmal granted bail to accused Badal Aalesh Rathod in a kidnapping case under the principle that "bail is a rule and jail an exception." The court found the relationship between the accused and victim was consensual, the victim was of adult age and not a minor, and importantly, both the informant and victim had no objection to his release. The court imposed bail conditions including a personal recognizance of Rs. 50,000 with a surety of equal amount and restrictions against intimidating witnesses or committing similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Yavatmal
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Yavatmal
-
04-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
District Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Yavatmal
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 53/2026
The Court of Sessions, Yavatmal granted bail to accused Badal Aalesh Rathod in a kidnapping case under the principle that "bail is a rule and jail an exception." The court found the relationship between the accused and victim was consensual, the victim was of adult age and not a minor, and importantly, both the informant and victim had no objection to his release. The court imposed bail conditions including a personal recognizance of Rs. 50,000 with a surety of equal amount and restrictions against intimidating witnesses or committing similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts