Badal Aalesh Rathod vs The State of Maharashtra through P. S. Parwa Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor (A.P.P.) — 53/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHYA010005322026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

140/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

53/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Yavatmal

Judge

4-District Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Yavatmal

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

FIR Number

358

Police Station

P.S.Parwa.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

Badal Aalesh Rathod

Adv. JAULKAR SANJAY RAMBHAU

Respondent(s)

The State of Maharashtra through P. S. Parwa Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor (A.P.P.)

Hearing History

Judge: 4-District Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Yavatmal

12-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

Hearing

04-03-2026

Reply/Say

27-02-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The Court of Sessions, Yavatmal granted bail to accused Badal Aalesh Rathod in a kidnapping case under the principle that "bail is a rule and jail an exception." The court found the relationship between the accused and victim was consensual, the victim was of adult age and not a minor, and importantly, both the informant and victim had no objection to his release. The court imposed bail conditions including a personal recognizance of Rs. 50,000 with a surety of equal amount and restrictions against intimidating witnesses or committing similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Court of Sessions, Yavatmal granted bail to accused Badal Aalesh Rathod in a kidnapping case under the principle that "bail is a rule and jail an exception." The court found the relationship between the accused and victim was consensual, the victim was of adult age and not a minor, and importantly, both the informant and victim had no objection to his release. The court imposed bail conditions including a personal recognizance of Rs. 50,000 with a surety of equal amount and restrictions against intimidating witnesses or committing similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court , Yavatmal All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case