Prashant Tanbaji Chandankhede vs The State of Maharashtra Through P. S. Ralegaon Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor (A.P.P.) — 47/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHYA010004802026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

21-02-2026

Filing Number

127/2026

Filing Date

21-02-2026

Registration No

47/2026

Registration Date

21-02-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Yavatmal

Judge

4-District Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Yavatmal

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

56

Police Station

P.S. Ralegaon.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

Prashant Tanbaji Chandankhede

Adv. IMRAN DESHMUKH

Respondent(s)

The State of Maharashtra Through P. S. Ralegaon Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor (A.P.P.)

Hearing History

Judge: 4-District Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Yavatmal

23-03-2026

Disposed

20-03-2026

Hearing

17-03-2026

Hearing

16-03-2026

Hearing

12-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The Court of Sessions, Yavatmal rejected the pre-arrest bail application of Prashant Tanbaji Chandankhede in a fake liquor trafficking case under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found prima facie evidence of his involvement, including discovery of his diary containing stock information in intercepted vehicles carrying 643 boxes of counterfeit liquor worth ₹1.05 crore, and deemed custodial interrogation necessary to ascertain the supply source. The court balanced personal liberty against public interest, noting his criminal antecedents (13 of 15 prior cases involved prohibition), risk of witness tampering, and possibility of abscondence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Court of Sessions, Yavatmal rejected the pre-arrest bail application of Prashant Tanbaji Chandankhede in a fake liquor trafficking case under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found prima facie evidence of his involvement, including discovery of his diary containing stock information in intercepted vehicles carrying 643 boxes of counterfeit liquor worth ₹1.05 crore, and deemed custodial interrogation necessary to ascertain the supply source. The court balanced personal liberty against public interest, noting his criminal antecedents (13 of 15 prior cases involved prohibition), risk of witness tampering, and possibility of abscondence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court , Yavatmal All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case