Prashant Tanbaji Chandankhede vs The State of Maharashtra Through P. S. Ralegaon Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor (A.P.P.) — 47/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHYA010004802026
e-Filing Number
21-02-2026
Filing Number
127/2026
Filing Date
21-02-2026
Registration No
47/2026
Registration Date
21-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Yavatmal
Judge
4-District Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Yavatmal
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
56
Police Station
P.S. Ralegaon.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prashant Tanbaji Chandankhede
Adv. IMRAN DESHMUKH
Respondent(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through P. S. Ralegaon Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor (A.P.P.)
Hearing History
Judge: 4-District Judge - 2 and A.S.J. Yavatmal
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 17-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 16-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Court of Sessions, Yavatmal rejected the pre-arrest bail application of Prashant Tanbaji Chandankhede in a fake liquor trafficking case under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found prima facie evidence of his involvement, including discovery of his diary containing stock information in intercepted vehicles carrying 643 boxes of counterfeit liquor worth ₹1.05 crore, and deemed custodial interrogation necessary to ascertain the supply source. The court balanced personal liberty against public interest, noting his criminal antecedents (13 of 15 prior cases involved prohibition), risk of witness tampering, and possibility of abscondence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Court of Sessions, Yavatmal rejected the pre-arrest bail application of Prashant Tanbaji Chandankhede in a fake liquor trafficking case under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found prima facie evidence of his involvement, including discovery of his diary containing stock information in intercepted vehicles carrying 643 boxes of counterfeit liquor worth ₹1.05 crore, and deemed custodial interrogation necessary to ascertain the supply source. The court balanced personal liberty against public interest, noting his criminal antecedents (13 of 15 prior cases involved prohibition), risk of witness tampering, and possibility of abscondence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts