The State of Maharashtra through Police station kalamb vs Sunil Shriram Meshram Advocate - अली एस. एम. — 17/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103,(1). Status: Production of Accused. Next hearing: 25th May 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHYA010004722025
Next Hearing
25th May 2026
Filing Number
148/2025
Filing Date
25-02-2025
Registration No
17/2025
Registration Date
25-02-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Yavatmal
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Yavatmal
FIR Details
FIR Number
584
Police Station
P.S.Kalamb
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra through Police station kalamb
Adv. A.P.P. Shri M. S. Gangalwar
Respondent(s)
Sunil Shriram Meshram Advocate - अली एस. एम.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Yavatmal
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
Production of Accused
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-05-2026 | Production of Accused |
| 02-05-2026 | Production of Accused |
| 20-04-2026 | Production of Accused |
| 08-04-2026 | Production of Accused |
| 07-04-2026 | Production of Accused |
Interim Orders
BAIL DENIED Accused Sunil's bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 was rejected by the Sessions Court, Yavatmal. The court found prima-facie evidence of the accused's involvement in the murder of the informant's father over a land dispute, with the postmortem confirming death by head injury. The court determined that releasing the accused on bail posed risks of witness tampering and repetition of crime, given the brutal nature of the offense and the cold-blooded manner in which it was committed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
BAIL DENIED Accused Sunil's bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 was rejected by the Sessions Court, Yavatmal. The court found prima-facie evidence of the accused's involvement in the murder of the informant's father over a land dispute, with the postmortem confirming death by head injury. The court determined that releasing the accused on bail posed risks of witness tampering and repetition of crime, given the brutal nature of the offense and the cold-blooded manner in which it was committed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts