The State of Maharashtra vs Abhijit Shivdas Raut Advocate - Meshram N.B.Adv. — 30/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 304. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 20th May 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHYA010003612021
Filing Number
122/2021
Filing Date
03-03-2021
Registration No
30/2021
Registration Date
03-03-2021
Court
District and Session Court , Yavatmal
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Yavatmal
Decision Date
20th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
346
Police Station
P.S.Babhulgaon
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP Shri Pande U.K
Respondent(s)
Abhijit Shivdas Raut Advocate - Meshram N.B.Adv.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Yavatmal
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-05-2026 | Judgment |
| 12-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 05-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 29-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Sessions Court, Yavatmal acquitted accused Abhijit Shivdas Raut of charges under IPC Section 304 (causing death by negligence) because the prosecution failed to prove that he owned or possessed the agricultural field where the deceased was electrocuted, or that he installed the live electric wire fencing. Although the death by electrocution was established, the court found insufficient evidence linking the accused to the hazardous wire installation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Sessions Court, Yavatmal acquitted accused Abhijit Shivdas Raut of charges under IPC Section 304 (causing death by negligence) because the prosecution failed to prove that he owned or possessed the agricultural field where the deceased was electrocuted, or that he installed the live electric wire fencing. Although the death by electrocution was established, the court found insufficient evidence linking the accused to the hazardous wire installation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts