The State of Maharashtra through P.S. Yavatmal Rural vs Praful Amrutlal Gupta Advocate - Deshmukh I N Adv. — 20/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 188,272,273,328,328. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHYA010001952024
Filing Number
85/2024
Filing Date
01-Feb-2024
Registration No
20/2024
Registration Date
05-Feb-2024
Court
District and Session Court , Yavatmal
Judge
24-Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
734
Police Station
P.S.Yavatmal Rural
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra through P.S. Yavatmal Rural
Adv. APP Shri Pande U.K
Respondent(s)
-
1.Praful Amrutlal Gupta Advocate - Deshmukh I N Adv.
Case History
-
23-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jul-2026
Arguments
Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
02-Jul-2026
Arguments
Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
20-Jun-2026
Order on Exhibit
Case 20/2024 Summary: In this petition filed by the State of Maharashtra through P.S. Yavatmal Rural against Praful Amrutlal Gupta (Advocate), the court examined arguments from both parties regarding the admissibility of certain documents. The court found that documents previously not submitted by the respondent's counsel were subsequently produced, and that the prosecution counsel had objected to their relevance during proceedings. The court determined it appropriate to permit submission of these documents and allow the opposing counsel to respond to arguments raised based on them. The petition was allowed by order dated 20 June 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Jun-2026
Arguments
Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
11-Jun-2026
Arguments
Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
03-Jun-2026
Arguments
Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
26-May-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
06-May-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
18-Apr-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
16-Apr-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
07-Apr-2026
Evidence
-
07-Apr-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
13-Feb-2026
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
12-Feb-2026
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
08-Jan-2026
Awaiting Muddemal
Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
07-Aug-2025
Awaiting Muddemal
District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
19-Jun-2025
Awaiting Muddemal
District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
28-May-2025
Awaiting Muddemal
District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
09-Apr-2025
Awaiting Muddemal
District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
05-Mar-2025
Awaiting Muddemal
District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
17-Feb-2025
Awaiting Muddemal
District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
05-Feb-2025
List of Witness
District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
08-Jan-2025
List of Witness
District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
11-Dec-2024
Charge
District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
16-Oct-2024
Charge
District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
28-Aug-2024
Charge
District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
10-Jul-2024
Charge
District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
15-Jun-2024
Charge
District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
15-May-2024
Charge
District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
08-Apr-2024
Charge
District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
04-Mar-2024
Appearance
District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
21-Feb-2024
Appearance
District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
07-Feb-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 20/2024
Case 20/2024 Summary: In this petition filed by the State of Maharashtra through P.S. Yavatmal Rural against Praful Amrutlal Gupta (Advocate), the court examined arguments from both parties regarding the admissibility of certain documents. The court found that documents previously not submitted by the respondent's counsel were subsequently produced, and that the prosecution counsel had objected to their relevance during proceedings. The court determined it appropriate to permit submission of these documents and allow the opposing counsel to respond to arguments raised based on them. The petition was allowed by order dated 20 June 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts