State of Mah. thr. P. S. O.Yavatmal City vs Rahul Ranga Chintalwar @Sinu Sanjay Shinde and others 7 Advocate - Ali S. M.Adv. — 8/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,143,144,147,148,149,120(B),364,201. Status: N.B.W._Unready. Next hearing: 26th May 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHYA010001012024
Next Hearing
26th May 2026
Filing Number
50/2024
Filing Date
17-01-2024
Registration No
8/2024
Registration Date
17-01-2024
Court
District and Session Court , Yavatmal
Judge
18-District Judge-1 and A.S.J., Yavatmal
FIR Details
FIR Number
503
Police Station
P.S.Yavatmal City
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Mah. thr. P. S. O.Yavatmal City
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Rahul Ranga Chintalwar @Sinu Sanjay Shinde and others 7 Advocate - Ali S. M.Adv.
Sheikh Rahim @ Sher Ali Moti Sayyed
Nayan Naresh Saudagar
Karan Sanjay Shinde
Vedant Santosh Mankar
Devansh Ajay Sharma
Farukh Khan @ Mukka Bashir Khan
Ajinkya Rambhau Kinhekar
Hearing History
Judge: 18-District Judge-1 and A.S.J., Yavatmal
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
Charge
Charge
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 29-04-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 15-04-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 01-04-2026 | Charge |
| 20-03-2026 | Charge |
Interim Orders
Bail Application Rejected In Special Case No. 8/2024 (State v. Rahul Chintalwar + 7), the Special Judge at Yavatmal rejected the bail application filed under Section 439 CrPC by accused No. 5 (Rahul Chintalwar). The court found a specific role of assault attributed to the applicant in the alleged murder case, distinguished him from co-accused already granted bail, and considered his criminal antecedents including a prior murder conviction. The court concluded the applicant is likely to silence witnesses and commit similar offences, making him unsuitable for bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Bail Application Rejected In Special Case No. 8/2024 (State v. Rahul Chintalwar + 7), the Special Judge at Yavatmal rejected the bail application filed under Section 439 CrPC by accused No. 5 (Rahul Chintalwar). The court found a specific role of assault attributed to the applicant in the alleged murder case, distinguished him from co-accused already granted bail, and considered his criminal antecedents including a prior murder conviction. The court concluded the applicant is likely to silence witnesses and commit similar offences, making him unsuitable for bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts