Nilima Chandrashekhar Mithe vs None — 5/2026
Case under Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act Section 8. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHYA010000772026
e-Filing Number
06-01-2026
Filing Number
54/2026
Filing Date
07-Jan-2026
Registration No
5/2026
Registration Date
08-Jan-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Yavatmal
Judge
24-Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECTED
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Nilima Chandrashekhar Mithe
Adv. CHAUDHARI ANIL DIGAMBARRAO
-
2.Gunjan Chandrashekhar Mithe through Natural Guardian Mother Nilima Chandrashekhar Mithe
Adv. CHAUDHARI ANIL DIGAMBARRAO
-
3.Soham Chandrashekhar Mithe Through Natural Guardian Mother Nilima Chandrashekhar Mithe
Adv. CHAUDHARI ANIL DIGAMBARRAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.None
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal at Yavatmal directed the Insurance Company to deposit Rs. 4,000 as Bhatta (court fee) by the next date to proceed with issuing witness summons, noting the company's over one-year non-compliance with a prior order and absence during proceedings. The tribunal warned that failure to deposit the amount would result in automatic rejection of the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
12-Mar-2026
Arguments
Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
27-Feb-2026
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.s.j., Yavatmal
-
12-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 5/2026
The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal at Yavatmal directed the Insurance Company to deposit Rs. 4,000 as Bhatta (court fee) by the next date to proceed with issuing witness summons, noting the company's over one-year non-compliance with a prior order and absence during proceedings. The tribunal warned that failure to deposit the amount would result in automatic rejection of the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts