Nilima Chandrashekhar Mithe vs None — 5/2026

Case under Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act Section 8. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHYA010000772026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

06-01-2026

Filing Number

54/2026

Filing Date

07-01-2026

Registration No

5/2026

Registration Date

08-01-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Yavatmal

Judge

24-Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.S.J., Yavatmal

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

HINDU MINORITY AND GUARDIANSHIP ACT Section 8
GUARDIANS AND WARDS ACT Section 29

Petitioner(s)

Nilima Chandrashekhar Mithe

Adv. CHAUDHARI ANIL DIGAMBARRAO

Gunjan Chandrashekhar Mithe through Natural Guardian Mother Nilima Chandrashekhar Mithe

Adv. CHAUDHARI ANIL DIGAMBARRAO

Soham Chandrashekhar Mithe Through Natural Guardian Mother Nilima Chandrashekhar Mithe

Adv. CHAUDHARI ANIL DIGAMBARRAO

Respondent(s)

None

Hearing History

Judge: 24-Adhoc District Judge-1 and A.S.J., Yavatmal

13-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Arguments

27-02-2026

Evidence

12-01-2026

Public Notice/Proclamation

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal at Yavatmal directed the Insurance Company to deposit Rs. 4,000 as Bhatta (court fee) by the next date to proceed with issuing witness summons, noting the company's over one-year non-compliance with a prior order and absence during proceedings. The tribunal warned that failure to deposit the amount would result in automatic rejection of the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal at Yavatmal directed the Insurance Company to deposit Rs. 4,000 as Bhatta (court fee) by the next date to proceed with issuing witness summons, noting the company's over one-year non-compliance with a prior order and absence during proceedings. The tribunal warned that failure to deposit the amount would result in automatic rejection of the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court , Yavatmal All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case