Sangita Arun Sardar vs Gayabai Jivlag Atote — 12/2025

Case Summary: RCS No. 12/2025 Outcome: Temporary injunction application REJECTED (21.04.2026) Plaintiffs Sangita and Prathamesh Sardar sought a temporary injunction to prevent defendant Gayabai from interfering with their possession of agricultural land (0.94 hectares). The plaintiffs claimed ownership based on a 2014 Will executed in favor of Arun Shankarrao Sardar, but the defendant obtained a revenue mutation (Entry No. 591) in her name. The court found the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, as revenue authorities had previously upheld the mutation and the plaintiffs produced no documentary evidence of actual possession. The court determined no balance of convenience favored the plaintiffs and they would not suffer irreparable loss, thus dismissing the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.