Udaysingh Maniram Rathod vs Manohar Keshavrao Ganjare — 32/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,35,36. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHWS110014902025

Written Statement

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

e-Filing Number

22-05-2025

Filing Number

1386/2025

Filing Date

18-06-2025

Registration No

32/2025

Registration Date

18-06-2025

Court

Civil Judge Senior Division, Karanja

Judge

3-2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Karanja

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,35,36

Petitioner(s)

Udaysingh Maniram Rathod

Adv. LAHOTI DURGADATTA VIJAYKUMAR

Sima Udaysingh Rathod

Adv. LAHOTI DURGADATTA VIJAYKUMAR

Chetan Udaysingh Rathod

Adv. LAHOTI DURGADATTA VIJAYKUMAR

Lakhan Udaysingh Rathod Through Sima Udaysingh Rathod

Adv. LAHOTI DURGADATTA VIJAYKUMAR

Vipul Shravan Rathod through Shravan Maniram Rathod

Adv. LAHOTI DURGADATTA VIJAYKUMAR

Respondent(s)

Manohar Keshavrao Ganjare

Hearing History

Judge: 3-2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Karanja

06-05-2026

Written Statement

28-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

27-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

18-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

01-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

Interim Orders

06-05-2026
Order on T.I.

Case Summary: RCS No. 32/2025 – Udaysingh v. Manohar Keshavrao Ganjare The plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction regarding disputed agricultural land measuring 1.26 hectares was rejected on 06.05.2026. The court found the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss. Key weaknesses included the plaintiffs' claim they recovered encroached land 15-20 days after measurement (2022) but filed suit only 2-3 years later without possession receipts, undermining their credibility. The court noted both parties owned adjacent parcels and a related suit (RCS 44/2024) with an injunction favoring the defendant was already pending in appellate review. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS No. 32/2025 – Udaysingh v. Manohar Keshavrao Ganjare The plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction regarding disputed agricultural land measuring 1.26 hectares was rejected on 06.05.2026. The court found the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss. Key weaknesses included the plaintiffs' claim they recovered encroached land 15-20 days after measurement (2022) but filed suit only 2-3 years later without possession receipts, undermining their credibility. The court noted both parties owned adjacent parcels and a related suit (RCS 44/2024) with an injunction favoring the defendant was already pending in appellate review. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Senior Division, Karanja All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case