Udaysingh Maniram Rathod vs Manohar Keshavrao Ganjare — 32/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,35,36. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Written Statement Next hearing 19-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHWS110014902025

e-Filing Number

22-05-2025

Filing Number

1386/2025

Filing Date

18-Jun-2025

Registration No

32/2025

Registration Date

18-Jun-2025

Court

Civil Judge Senior Division, Karanja

Judge

3-2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Karanja

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,35,36

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Udaysingh Maniram Rathod

    Adv. LAHOTI DURGADATTA VIJAYKUMAR

  2. 2.Sima Udaysingh Rathod

    Adv. LAHOTI DURGADATTA VIJAYKUMAR

  3. 3.Chetan Udaysingh Rathod

    Adv. LAHOTI DURGADATTA VIJAYKUMAR

  4. 4.Lakhan Udaysingh Rathod Through Sima Udaysingh Rathod

    Adv. LAHOTI DURGADATTA VIJAYKUMAR

  5. 5.Vipul Shravan Rathod through Shravan Maniram Rathod

    Adv. LAHOTI DURGADATTA VIJAYKUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manohar Keshavrao Ganjare

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: RCS No. 32/2025 – Udaysingh v. Manohar Keshavrao Ganjare The plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction regarding disputed agricultural land measuring 1.26 hectares was rejected on 06.05.2026. The court found the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss. Key weaknesses included the plaintiffs' claim they recovered encroached land 15-20 days after measurement (2022) but filed suit only 2-3 years later without possession receipts, undermining their credibility. The court noted both parties owned adjacent parcels and a related suit (RCS 44/2024) with an injunction favoring the defendant was already pending in appellate review. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Written Statement

    2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Karanja

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Karanja

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Karanja

  6. 18-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Karanja

  7. 01-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Karanja

  8. 23-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Karanja

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Karanja

  10. 07-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Karanja

  11. 25-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Karanja

  12. 07-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Karanja

  13. 21-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    2nd Jt Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Karanja

  14. 20-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 18-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 32/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS No. 32/2025 – Udaysingh v. Manohar Keshavrao Ganjare The plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction regarding disputed agricultural land measuring 1.26 hectares was rejected on 06.05.2026. The court found the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss. Key weaknesses included the plaintiffs' claim they recovered encroached land 15-20 days after measurement (2022) but filed suit only 2-3 years later without possession receipts, undermining their credibility. The court noted both parties owned adjacent parcels and a related suit (RCS 44/2024) with an injunction favoring the defendant was already pending in appellate review. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case