Sheela Atamaram Bhagat vs Swapnil Mohan Bhagat Advocate - Patil Nilesh Shridhar — 48/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order39 R 2. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHWS110013542025
Filing Number
1253/2025
Filing Date
26-Sep-2019
Registration No
48/2025
Registration Date
26-Sep-2019
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division, Karanja
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sheela Atamaram Bhagat
Respondent(s)
-
1.Swapnil Mohan Bhagat Advocate - Patil Nilesh Shridhar
-
2.Mohan Shriram Bhagat.
Adv. Patil Nilesh Shridhar
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
20-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
07-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: Sheela Atmaram Bhagat v. Swapnil Mohan Bhagat & Anr. (48/2025) The defendants' application to produce documents on record was allowed by the Civil Judge on 07/04/2026. The court found that permitting document production would cause no prejudice to the plaintiff and granted the application. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
02-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
23-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
02-Mar-2026
Additional Issues
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
17-Feb-2026
Compliance
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
27-Jan-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
12-Jan-2026
Amended Plaint
Civil Judge Senior Division
-
10-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Sep-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 48/2025
Case Summary: Sheela Atmaram Bhagat v. Swapnil Mohan Bhagat & Anr. (48/2025) The defendants' application to produce documents on record was allowed by the Civil Judge on 07/04/2026. The court found that permitting document production would cause no prejudice to the plaintiff and granted the application. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts