Mo.Aarif Ab.Nabi vs State Of Maharashtra Thorugh its Collector Washim — 122/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 02. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS110013162025
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
1215/2025
Filing Date
23-03-2021
Registration No
122/2025
Registration Date
23-03-2021
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division, Karanja
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mo.Aarif Ab.Nabi
Adv. S.Y.Kashid
Respondent(s)
State Of Maharashtra Thorugh its Collector Washim
Tahsildar Karanja
Adv. GANGAWANE GOVARDHAN DNYANDEO
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 15-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 25-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 16-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 05-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 122/2025 Petitioner Mo. Aarif Ab. Nabi sought to set aside a "no say" order dated 06/04/2023 and permission to file his reply to the State's application under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. (rejecting his plaint for declaration and perpetual injunction). The Civil Judge allowed the application, set aside the "no say" order, and permitted the petitioner to file his say on record, finding it just to decide the matter on merits by giving both parties opportunity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 122/2025 Petitioner Mo. Aarif Ab. Nabi sought to set aside a "no say" order dated 06/04/2023 and permission to file his reply to the State's application under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C. (rejecting his plaint for declaration and perpetual injunction). The Civil Judge allowed the application, set aside the "no say" order, and permitted the petitioner to file his say on record, finding it just to decide the matter on merits by giving both parties opportunity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts