Preeti Tejas Chaware vs State Of Maharashtra Through its Collector Advocate - GIMEKAR SAHEBRAO KHANDUJI — 120/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 02. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHWS110013152025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

Filing Number

1214/2025

Filing Date

09-03-2021

Registration No

120/2025

Registration Date

09-03-2021

Court

Civil Judge Senior Division, Karanja

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 02

Petitioner(s)

Preeti Tejas Chaware

Adv. G.V.Biyani

Respondent(s)

State Of Maharashtra Through its Collector Advocate - GIMEKAR SAHEBRAO KHANDUJI

Tahsildar Karanja lad

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division

30-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

15-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

25-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

16-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

05-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

24-12-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: Case No. 120/2025 Preeti Tejas Chaware v. State of Maharashtra The Civil Judge rejected the State's application to dismiss plaintiff's suit. The plaintiff challenged a Tahsildar's order dated 25/11/2020 imposing a fine of Rs. 28,37,592 for unauthorized conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural use. The court held the suit for declaration and injunction is maintainable, finding no bar under the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act or Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, as the plaintiff seeks civil reliefs unavailable through revenue remedies and contests the Tahsildar's compliance with natural justice principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Case No. 120/2025 Preeti Tejas Chaware v. State of Maharashtra The Civil Judge rejected the State's application to dismiss plaintiff's suit. The plaintiff challenged a Tahsildar's order dated 25/11/2020 imposing a fine of Rs. 28,37,592 for unauthorized conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural use. The court held the suit for declaration and injunction is maintainable, finding no bar under the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act or Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, as the plaintiff seeks civil reliefs unavailable through revenue remedies and contests the Tahsildar's compliance with natural justice principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Senior Division, Karanja All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case