Preeti Tejas Chaware vs State Of Maharashtra Through its Collector Advocate - GIMEKAR SAHEBRAO KHANDUJI — 120/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 02. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS110013152025
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
1214/2025
Filing Date
09-03-2021
Registration No
120/2025
Registration Date
09-03-2021
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division, Karanja
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Preeti Tejas Chaware
Adv. G.V.Biyani
Respondent(s)
State Of Maharashtra Through its Collector Advocate - GIMEKAR SAHEBRAO KHANDUJI
Tahsildar Karanja lad
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 15-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 25-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 16-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 05-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: Case No. 120/2025 Preeti Tejas Chaware v. State of Maharashtra The Civil Judge rejected the State's application to dismiss plaintiff's suit. The plaintiff challenged a Tahsildar's order dated 25/11/2020 imposing a fine of Rs. 28,37,592 for unauthorized conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural use. The court held the suit for declaration and injunction is maintainable, finding no bar under the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act or Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, as the plaintiff seeks civil reliefs unavailable through revenue remedies and contests the Tahsildar's compliance with natural justice principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Case No. 120/2025 Preeti Tejas Chaware v. State of Maharashtra The Civil Judge rejected the State's application to dismiss plaintiff's suit. The plaintiff challenged a Tahsildar's order dated 25/11/2020 imposing a fine of Rs. 28,37,592 for unauthorized conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural use. The court held the suit for declaration and injunction is maintainable, finding no bar under the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act or Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, as the plaintiff seeks civil reliefs unavailable through revenue remedies and contests the Tahsildar's compliance with natural justice principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts