Ishwar Rameshwar Dendule vs State Of Maharashtra Through its Collector Washim Advocate - GIMEKAR SAHEBRAO KHANDUJI — 115/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 02. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 18-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHWS110013132025

Filing Number

1212/2025

Filing Date

06-Feb-2021

Registration No

115/2025

Registration Date

06-Feb-2021

Court

Civil Judge Senior Division, Karanja

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 02

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ishwar Rameshwar Dendule

    Adv. S.Y.Kashid

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Maharashtra Through its Collector Washim Advocate - GIMEKAR SAHEBRAO KHANDUJI

  2. 2.Tahsildar Karanja Karanja

    Adv. GANGAWANE GOVARDHAN DNYANDEO

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  9. 08-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  10. 24-Dec-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: Ishwar Rameshwar Dendule v. State of Maharashtra Outcome: The defendant's application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC was rejected. The civil suit for declaration and permanent injunction challenging a Tahsildar's order regarding unauthorized conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural use is maintainable and will proceed. Key Points: The court found the plaintiff stated a valid cause of action in the plaint and held that the civil court has jurisdiction to entertain the suit despite arguments that it was barred under the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act and Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, as the plaintiff seeks reliefs (declaration and injunction) that only civil courts can grant, not revenue authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 24-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  12. 18-Dec-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  13. 11-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 06-Feb-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 115/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Ishwar Rameshwar Dendule v. State of Maharashtra Outcome: The defendant's application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC was rejected. The civil suit for declaration and permanent injunction challenging a Tahsildar's order regarding unauthorized conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural use is maintainable and will proceed. Key Points: The court found the plaintiff stated a valid cause of action in the plaint and held that the civil court has jurisdiction to entertain the suit despite arguments that it was barred under the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act and Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, as the plaintiff seeks reliefs (declaration and injunction) that only civil courts can grant, not revenue authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case