Ishwar Rameshwar Dendule vs State Of Maharashtra Through its Collector Washim Advocate - GIMEKAR SAHEBRAO KHANDUJI — 115/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 02. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS110013132025
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
1212/2025
Filing Date
06-02-2021
Registration No
115/2025
Registration Date
06-02-2021
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division, Karanja
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ishwar Rameshwar Dendule
Adv. S.Y.Kashid
Respondent(s)
State Of Maharashtra Through its Collector Washim Advocate - GIMEKAR SAHEBRAO KHANDUJI
Tahsildar Karanja Karanja
Adv. GANGAWANE GOVARDHAN DNYANDEO
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 15-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 25-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 16-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 05-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Ishwar Rameshwar Dendule v. State of Maharashtra Outcome: The defendant's application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC was rejected. The civil suit for declaration and permanent injunction challenging a Tahsildar's order regarding unauthorized conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural use is maintainable and will proceed. Key Points: The court found the plaintiff stated a valid cause of action in the plaint and held that the civil court has jurisdiction to entertain the suit despite arguments that it was barred under the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act and Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, as the plaintiff seeks reliefs (declaration and injunction) that only civil courts can grant, not revenue authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Ishwar Rameshwar Dendule v. State of Maharashtra Outcome: The defendant's application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC was rejected. The civil suit for declaration and permanent injunction challenging a Tahsildar's order regarding unauthorized conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural use is maintainable and will proceed. Key Points: The court found the plaintiff stated a valid cause of action in the plaint and held that the civil court has jurisdiction to entertain the suit despite arguments that it was barred under the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act and Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, as the plaintiff seeks reliefs (declaration and injunction) that only civil courts can grant, not revenue authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts