Sudhir Madhukarrao Nakhate vs sundarlal Saoji urban Co operative Bank Limited Jintur Advocate - JOHARPURKAR RANJAN SHANTIKUMAR — 91/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 91. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 18th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHWS110013052025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1204/2025

Filing Date

30-10-2017

Registration No

91/2025

Registration Date

30-10-2017

Court

Civil Judge Senior Division, Karanja

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division

Decision Date

18th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 91

Petitioner(s)

Sudhir Madhukarrao Nakhate

Adv. Chaudhari Shrikant Gajananrao

Respondent(s)

sundarlal Saoji urban Co operative Bank Limited Jintur Advocate - JOHARPURKAR RANJAN SHANTIKUMAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division

18-04-2026

Disposed

17-04-2026

Judgment

09-04-2026

Judgment

04-04-2026

Arguments

27-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

18-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: Sudhir Madhukarrao Nakhate vs. Sundarlal Saoji Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. Court Decision: The Civil Judge, Senior Division (Karanja, Washim) dismissed plaintiff Sudhir Nakhate's suit for declaration and damages against the bank, finding that the departmental enquiry leading to his dismissal was conducted fairly and without breach of natural justice principles. Key Finding: Despite Nakhate's claims that the enquiry was illegal and biased, the court determined that he was afforded full opportunity to participate in the enquiry, received copies of witness statements, and was permitted (though he refused) to cross-examine witnesses. The court rejected his allegations of procedural impropriety as unsupported by credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sudhir Madhukarrao Nakhate vs. Sundarlal Saoji Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. Court Decision: The Civil Judge, Senior Division (Karanja, Washim) dismissed plaintiff Sudhir Nakhate's suit for declaration and damages against the bank, finding that the departmental enquiry leading to his dismissal was conducted fairly and without breach of natural justice principles. Key Finding: Despite Nakhate's claims that the enquiry was illegal and biased, the court determined that he was afforded full opportunity to participate in the enquiry, received copies of witness statements, and was permitted (though he refused) to cross-examine witnesses. The court rejected his allegations of procedural impropriety as unsupported by credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Senior Division, Karanja All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case