Sudhir Madhukarrao Nakhate vs sundarlal Saoji urban Co operative Bank Limited Jintur Advocate - JOHARPURKAR RANJAN SHANTIKUMAR — 91/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 91. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 18th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS110013052025
Filing Number
1204/2025
Filing Date
30-10-2017
Registration No
91/2025
Registration Date
30-10-2017
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division, Karanja
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sudhir Madhukarrao Nakhate
Adv. Chaudhari Shrikant Gajananrao
Respondent(s)
sundarlal Saoji urban Co operative Bank Limited Jintur Advocate - JOHARPURKAR RANJAN SHANTIKUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 09-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 04-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Sudhir Madhukarrao Nakhate vs. Sundarlal Saoji Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. Court Decision: The Civil Judge, Senior Division (Karanja, Washim) dismissed plaintiff Sudhir Nakhate's suit for declaration and damages against the bank, finding that the departmental enquiry leading to his dismissal was conducted fairly and without breach of natural justice principles. Key Finding: Despite Nakhate's claims that the enquiry was illegal and biased, the court determined that he was afforded full opportunity to participate in the enquiry, received copies of witness statements, and was permitted (though he refused) to cross-examine witnesses. The court rejected his allegations of procedural impropriety as unsupported by credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Sudhir Madhukarrao Nakhate vs. Sundarlal Saoji Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. Court Decision: The Civil Judge, Senior Division (Karanja, Washim) dismissed plaintiff Sudhir Nakhate's suit for declaration and damages against the bank, finding that the departmental enquiry leading to his dismissal was conducted fairly and without breach of natural justice principles. Key Finding: Despite Nakhate's claims that the enquiry was illegal and biased, the court determined that he was afforded full opportunity to participate in the enquiry, received copies of witness statements, and was permitted (though he refused) to cross-examine witnesses. The court rejected his allegations of procedural impropriety as unsupported by credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts