Nitesh Ramesh Gavhane vs State through Collector Washim — 167/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 39. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS110012972025
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
16-01-2025
Filing Number
1197/2025
Filing Date
16-01-2025
Registration No
167/2025
Registration Date
16-01-2025
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division, Karanja
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nitesh Ramesh Gavhane
Adv. KHANDAGALE ARUN ANNASAHEB
Sunil Manohar Dakhore
Adv. YEOLE MANOJ VASANTRAO
Respondent(s)
State through Collector Washim
Sub Divisional Officer Karanja
Deputy Superintendent Land Records Karanja
Adv. DHOBLE PURUDHOTTAM SADHASHIV
Tehsildar Karanja Lad
Chief Municipal Council Karanja Lad
Adv. WADEKAR DILIP GANGADHAR
Prakash Vasantrao Ghude
Adv. PINJARKAR DIGAMBAR KRISHNARAO
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division
Issues
Issues
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Issues |
| 13-04-2026 | Issues |
| 06-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 01-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 16-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 167/2025 Outcome: Application for temporary injunction rejected. The Civil Judge found that petitioners Nitesh Ramesh Gavhane and Sunil Manohar Dakhore failed to establish a prima facie case for temporary injunction against municipal authorities. The court determined that petitioners suppressed material facts regarding a Government road (Plot No. 83) adjoining their properties and misrepresented property boundaries in their plaint. The court held petitioners allegedly made encroachments on Government land and are therefore not entitled to court protection without demonstrating legal rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 167/2025 Outcome: Application for temporary injunction rejected. The Civil Judge found that petitioners Nitesh Ramesh Gavhane and Sunil Manohar Dakhore failed to establish a prima facie case for temporary injunction against municipal authorities. The court determined that petitioners suppressed material facts regarding a Government road (Plot No. 83) adjoining their properties and misrepresented property boundaries in their plaint. The court held petitioners allegedly made encroachments on Government land and are therefore not entitled to court protection without demonstrating legal rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts