Nitesh Ramesh Gavhane vs State through Collector Washim — 167/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 39. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Issues Next hearing 16-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHWS110012972025

e-Filing Number

16-01-2025

Filing Number

1197/2025

Filing Date

16-Jan-2025

Registration No

167/2025

Registration Date

16-Jan-2025

Court

Civil Judge Senior Division, Karanja

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nitesh Ramesh Gavhane

    Adv. KHANDAGALE ARUN ANNASAHEB

  2. 2.Sunil Manohar Dakhore

    Adv. YEOLE MANOJ VASANTRAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State through Collector Washim

  2. 2.Sub Divisional Officer Karanja

  3. 3.Deputy Superintendent Land Records Karanja

    Adv. DHOBLE PURUDHOTTAM SADHASHIV

  4. 4.Tehsildar Karanja Lad

  5. 5.Chief Municipal Council Karanja Lad

    Adv. WADEKAR DILIP GANGADHAR

  6. 6.Prakash Vasantrao Ghude

    Adv. PINJARKAR DIGAMBAR KRISHNARAO

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-May-2026

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 167/2025 Outcome: Application for temporary injunction rejected. The Civil Judge found that petitioners Nitesh Ramesh Gavhane and Sunil Manohar Dakhore failed to establish a prima facie case for temporary injunction against municipal authorities. The court determined that petitioners suppressed material facts regarding a Government road (Plot No. 83) adjoining their properties and misrepresented property boundaries in their plaint. The court held petitioners allegedly made encroachments on Government land and are therefore not entitled to court protection without demonstrating legal rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  9. 10-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  10. 17-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  11. 20-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 16-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 167/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 167/2025 Outcome: Application for temporary injunction rejected. The Civil Judge found that petitioners Nitesh Ramesh Gavhane and Sunil Manohar Dakhore failed to establish a prima facie case for temporary injunction against municipal authorities. The court determined that petitioners suppressed material facts regarding a Government road (Plot No. 83) adjoining their properties and misrepresented property boundaries in their plaint. The court held petitioners allegedly made encroachments on Government land and are therefore not entitled to court protection without demonstrating legal rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case