Prabhabai Keaval Rathod vs Nil — 375/2025

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 25th March 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHWS110011592025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

20-11-2025

Filing Number

1065/2025

Filing Date

28-11-2025

Registration No

375/2025

Registration Date

28-11-2025

Court

Civil Judge Senior Division, Karanja

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Karanja

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

Prabhabai Keaval Rathod

Adv. PAWAR ANIL ASHARAM

Nitin Keval Rathod

Adv. PAWAR ANIL ASHARAM

Abhiman Keval Rathod

Adv. PAWAR ANIL ASHARAM

Shital Sanjay Jadhao

Adv. PAWAR ANIL ASHARAM

Respondent(s)

Nil

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Karanja

25-03-2026

Disposed

24-03-2026

Public Notice/Proclamation

23-03-2026

Public Notice/Proclamation

18-03-2026

Public Notice/Proclamation

16-03-2026

Public Notice/Proclamation

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 375/2025 The Joint Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Karanja, Washim District, granted the petition of Prabhabai Keaval Rathod and her sons Nitin and Abhiman Keaval Rathod, declaring them as legal heirs of the deceased Keaval Kashiram Rathod (who died on 18/10/2025) under the Bombay Regulation 1827. The court found that the petitioners had established their status as rightful heirs through supporting documents and unchallenged testimony, with no other legal heirs identified, and issued a heirship certificate accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 375/2025 The Joint Civil Judge (Junior Division) at Karanja, Washim District, granted the petition of Prabhabai Keaval Rathod and her sons Nitin and Abhiman Keaval Rathod, declaring them as legal heirs of the deceased Keaval Kashiram Rathod (who died on 18/10/2025) under the Bombay Regulation 1827. The court found that the petitioners had established their status as rightful heirs through supporting documents and unchallenged testimony, with no other legal heirs identified, and issued a heirship certificate accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Senior Division, Karanja All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case