Mohd.Imran Mo.Shafi Punjani vs State Of Maharashtra Through its Collector — 118/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 02. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 18-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHWS110010382025

Filing Number

944/2025

Filing Date

04-Mar-2021

Registration No

118/2025

Registration Date

04-Mar-2021

Court

Civil Judge Senior Division, Karanja

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 02

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mohd.Imran Mo.Shafi Punjani

    Adv. S.Y.Kashid

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of Maharashtra Through its Collector

  2. 2.Tahsildar, Karanja lad

    Adv. GANGAWANE GOVARDHAN DNYANDEO

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: 118/2025 The court rejected the state's application seeking dismissal of the plaintiff's suit. Mohd. Imran Punjani filed a declaration and injunction suit challenging a Tahsildar order from November 2020 that imposed a fine of Rs. 9,58,392 for unauthorized conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural use. The court found the suit maintainable, holding that civil courts have jurisdiction to examine whether revenue officers exceeded their authority or violated natural justice principles, even when statutory remedies exist, and that the plaintiff's claims are not barred under the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act or Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  8. 05-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  10. 18-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  11. 08-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  12. 24-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  13. 18-Dec-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division

  14. 11-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 04-Mar-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 118/2025

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: 118/2025 The court rejected the state's application seeking dismissal of the plaintiff's suit. Mohd. Imran Punjani filed a declaration and injunction suit challenging a Tahsildar order from November 2020 that imposed a fine of Rs. 9,58,392 for unauthorized conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural use. The court found the suit maintainable, holding that civil courts have jurisdiction to examine whether revenue officers exceeded their authority or violated natural justice principles, even when statutory remedies exist, and that the plaintiff's claims are not barred under the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act or Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case