Amit Rameshwar Dendule Through Ishwar Rameshwar Dendule vs State of Maharashtra Though its collector Advocate - GIMEKAR SAHEBRAO KHANDUJI — 117/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 02. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHWS110010362025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

Filing Number

942/2025

Filing Date

22-02-2021

Registration No

117/2025

Registration Date

22-02-2021

Court

Civil Judge Senior Division, Karanja

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 02

Petitioner(s)

Amit Rameshwar Dendule Through Ishwar Rameshwar Dendule

Adv. Kasio Shakil Yasin

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Though its collector Advocate - GIMEKAR SAHEBRAO KHANDUJI

Tahsildar Karanja lad

Adv. GANGAWANE GOVARDHAN DNYANDEO

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division

30-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

15-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

25-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

16-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

05-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

24-12-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 117/2025 Outcome: The application filed by the State of Maharashtra to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was rejected. The court found the plaintiff's suit for declaration and permanent injunction challenging a Tahsildar's order imposing a fine for unauthorized conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural use is maintainable, as it seeks reliefs only civil courts can grant and does not fall within statutory bars under the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act or Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 117/2025 Outcome: The application filed by the State of Maharashtra to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was rejected. The court found the plaintiff's suit for declaration and permanent injunction challenging a Tahsildar's order imposing a fine for unauthorized conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural use is maintainable, as it seeks reliefs only civil courts can grant and does not fall within statutory bars under the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act or Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Senior Division, Karanja All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case