Amit Rameshwar Dendule Through Ishwar Rameshwar Dendule vs State of Maharashtra Though its collector Advocate - GIMEKAR SAHEBRAO KHANDUJI — 117/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 02. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS110010362025
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
942/2025
Filing Date
22-02-2021
Registration No
117/2025
Registration Date
22-02-2021
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division, Karanja
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Amit Rameshwar Dendule Through Ishwar Rameshwar Dendule
Adv. Kasio Shakil Yasin
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Though its collector Advocate - GIMEKAR SAHEBRAO KHANDUJI
Tahsildar Karanja lad
Adv. GANGAWANE GOVARDHAN DNYANDEO
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 15-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 25-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 16-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 05-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 117/2025 Outcome: The application filed by the State of Maharashtra to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was rejected. The court found the plaintiff's suit for declaration and permanent injunction challenging a Tahsildar's order imposing a fine for unauthorized conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural use is maintainable, as it seeks reliefs only civil courts can grant and does not fall within statutory bars under the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act or Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 117/2025 Outcome: The application filed by the State of Maharashtra to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was rejected. The court found the plaintiff's suit for declaration and permanent injunction challenging a Tahsildar's order imposing a fine for unauthorized conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural use is maintainable, as it seeks reliefs only civil courts can grant and does not fall within statutory bars under the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act or Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts