Shabana Bano Mohd Amin Panjwani vs State of Maharashtra Through Collector Washim Advocate - GIMEKAR SAHEBRAO KHANDUJI — 127/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 02. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS110010352025
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
941/2025
Filing Date
09-04-2021
Registration No
127/2025
Registration Date
09-04-2021
Court
Civil Judge Senior Division, Karanja
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shabana Bano Mohd Amin Panjwani
Adv. BIYANI GAURAV VINODKUMARJI
Amrin Bano Noor Mohammad
Adv. BIYANI GAURAV VINODKUMARJI
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Collector Washim Advocate - GIMEKAR SAHEBRAO KHANDUJI
Tahsildar Karanja Lad
Adv. GANGAWANE GOVARDHAN DNYANDEO
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 15-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 25-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 16-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 05-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 127/2025 The Civil Judge rejected the State of Maharashtra's application seeking rejection of the plaintiffs' plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC. Plaintiffs Shabana Bano and Amrin Bano challenged a Tahsildar's order imposing a fine of Rs. 14,66,100 for allegedly converting agricultural land to non-agricultural use without permission. The court found the suit maintainable, holding that plaintiffs could seek declaration and injunction relief in civil court despite the Tahsildar's revenue proceedings, as they alleged violation of natural justice principles. The application was rejected with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 127/2025 The Civil Judge rejected the State of Maharashtra's application seeking rejection of the plaintiffs' plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC. Plaintiffs Shabana Bano and Amrin Bano challenged a Tahsildar's order imposing a fine of Rs. 14,66,100 for allegedly converting agricultural land to non-agricultural use without permission. The court found the suit maintainable, holding that plaintiffs could seek declaration and injunction relief in civil court despite the Tahsildar's revenue proceedings, as they alleged violation of natural justice principles. The application was rejected with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts