Shabana Bano Mohd Amin Panjwani vs State of Maharashtra Through Collector Washim Advocate - GIMEKAR SAHEBRAO KHANDUJI — 127/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 02. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHWS110010352025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

Filing Number

941/2025

Filing Date

09-04-2021

Registration No

127/2025

Registration Date

09-04-2021

Court

Civil Judge Senior Division, Karanja

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 02

Petitioner(s)

Shabana Bano Mohd Amin Panjwani

Adv. BIYANI GAURAV VINODKUMARJI

Amrin Bano Noor Mohammad

Adv. BIYANI GAURAV VINODKUMARJI

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Through Collector Washim Advocate - GIMEKAR SAHEBRAO KHANDUJI

Tahsildar Karanja Lad

Adv. GANGAWANE GOVARDHAN DNYANDEO

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division

30-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

15-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

25-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

16-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

05-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

24-12-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 127/2025 The Civil Judge rejected the State of Maharashtra's application seeking rejection of the plaintiffs' plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC. Plaintiffs Shabana Bano and Amrin Bano challenged a Tahsildar's order imposing a fine of Rs. 14,66,100 for allegedly converting agricultural land to non-agricultural use without permission. The court found the suit maintainable, holding that plaintiffs could seek declaration and injunction relief in civil court despite the Tahsildar's revenue proceedings, as they alleged violation of natural justice principles. The application was rejected with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 127/2025 The Civil Judge rejected the State of Maharashtra's application seeking rejection of the plaintiffs' plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC. Plaintiffs Shabana Bano and Amrin Bano challenged a Tahsildar's order imposing a fine of Rs. 14,66,100 for allegedly converting agricultural land to non-agricultural use without permission. The court found the suit maintainable, holding that plaintiffs could seek declaration and injunction relief in civil court despite the Tahsildar's revenue proceedings, as they alleged violation of natural justice principles. The application was rejected with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Senior Division, Karanja All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case