Gajanan Ramchandra Kavhar vs Shrikant @ Balu Eaknath Lade Advocate - MATOLE DINESH DHANRAJ — 91/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS100015262022
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
259/2022
Filing Date
11-10-2022
Registration No
91/2022
Registration Date
11-10-2022
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division, Malegaon
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. MALEGAON
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gajanan Ramchandra Kavhar
Adv. MAGAR SHANKARRAO SAKHARAMJI
Respondent(s)
Shrikant @ Balu Eaknath Lade Advocate - MATOLE DINESH DHANRAJ
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. MALEGAON
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 16-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 27-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 28-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 07-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S. 91/2022 - Gajanan v. Shrikant Outcome: Plaintiff's temporary injunction application allowed; Defendant's temporary injunction application rejected. The defendant is restrained from interfering with the plaintiff's possession of disputed agricultural land (Gat No. 257, Dudhala, Malegaon, Washim) until final disposal of the suit. Key Facts: Plaintiff purchased the property via registered sale deed (No. 543/2019) from deceased Eknath Mahadaji Lade on 13.03.2019 for ₹3,95,000 and obtained mutation in revenue records. Defendant claims the sale deed was nominal—merely securing a ₹2 lakh loan—and alleges he paid ₹13 lakh total for loan repayment while remaining in possession. Court found plaintiff's documentary evidence (sale deed, mutation entry, 7/12 extracts, tax receipts, witness affidavits) established prima facie possession, while defendant provided no possession documents. Defendant's cancellation plea under Maharashtra Money-Lending Act was rejected by revenue authorities (25.09.2024). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S. 91/2022 - Gajanan v. Shrikant Outcome: Plaintiff's temporary injunction application allowed; Defendant's temporary injunction application rejected. The defendant is restrained from interfering with the plaintiff's possession of disputed agricultural land (Gat No. 257, Dudhala, Malegaon, Washim) until final disposal of the suit. Key Facts: Plaintiff purchased the property via registered sale deed (No. 543/2019) from deceased Eknath Mahadaji Lade on 13.03.2019 for ₹3,95,000 and obtained mutation in revenue records. Defendant claims the sale deed was nominal—merely securing a ₹2 lakh loan—and alleges he paid ₹13 lakh total for loan repayment while remaining in possession. Court found plaintiff's documentary evidence (sale deed, mutation entry, 7/12 extracts, tax receipts, witness affidavits) established prima facie possession, while defendant provided no possession documents. Defendant's cancellation plea under Maharashtra Money-Lending Act was rejected by revenue authorities (25.09.2024). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts