State of Maharashtra Through P S O PS Jaulka vs Ganpat Suresh Dakhore — 768/2022
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 06th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHWS100015022022
Filing Number
1247/2022
Filing Date
06-10-2022
Registration No
768/2022
Registration Date
06-10-2022
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division, Malegaon
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. MALEGAON
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
0215
Police Station
JAULKA
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through P S O PS (Police Station) Jaulka
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Ganpat Suresh Dakhore
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. MALEGAON
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 12-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 19-11-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 04-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Ganpat Suresh Dakhore (768/2022) The Judicial Magistrate First Class discharged the accused under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and acquitted him of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. The court found that despite repeated summons, the accused remained absent, the prosecution failed to secure his attendance, no Investigating Officer's report was filed, and there was no likelihood of the accused appearing in the near future, warranting termination of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Ganpat Suresh Dakhore (768/2022) The Judicial Magistrate First Class discharged the accused under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and acquitted him of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. The court found that despite repeated summons, the accused remained absent, the prosecution failed to secure his attendance, no Investigating Officer's report was filed, and there was no likelihood of the accused appearing in the near future, warranting termination of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts