State of Maharashtra Through State Excise Department Washim vs Gajanan Suryabhan Dahatre — 752/2022
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 06th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHWS100014742022
Filing Number
1220/2022
Filing Date
03-10-2022
Registration No
752/2022
Registration Date
03-10-2022
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division, Malegaon
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. MALEGAON
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
209
Police Station
Excise Insp.Wsm.
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through State Excise Department Washim
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Gajanan Suryabhan Dahatre
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. MALEGAON
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 01-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 15-10-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 11-07-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Gajanan Suryabhan Dahatre (752/2022) The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC and discharged the accused of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, due to the accused's prolonged absence, repeated failure to appear despite summons, lack of prosecution efforts to secure attendance, and non-filing of the Investigating Officer's report. The seized liquor (40 bottles of country liquor and 12 bottles of I.B.) is to be destroyed after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Gajanan Suryabhan Dahatre (752/2022) The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC and discharged the accused of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, due to the accused's prolonged absence, repeated failure to appear despite summons, lack of prosecution efforts to secure attendance, and non-filing of the Investigating Officer's report. The seized liquor (40 bottles of country liquor and 12 bottles of I.B.) is to be destroyed after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts