State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Malegaon vs Laxman Vasudeo Andhale Advocate - LAHOTI VIJAY RAMPAL — 1100138/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 494,498(a),506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 04th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHWS100012652015
Filing Number
1101043/2015
Filing Date
05-Aug-2015
Registration No
1100138/2015
Registration Date
05-Aug-2015
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division, Malegaon
Judge
2-Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
37
Police Station
MALEGAON
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Malegaon
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Laxman Vasudeo Andhale Advocate - LAHOTI VIJAY RAMPAL
-
2.Vasudevo Devrao Andhale
Adv. V.R. Lahoti
-
3.Babaibai Vasudevo Andhale
Adv. V.R.Lahoti
-
4.Gajanan Devidas Andhale
Adv. V.R.Lahoti
-
5.Nandabai Trambak Tare
Adv. V.R.Lahoti
-
6.Trambak Uttam Tare
Adv. V.R..Lahoti
-
7.Nandabai Babarao Gangawane
Adv. V.R..Lahoti
-
8.Babarao Mahdevo Gangawane
Adv. V.R..Lahoti
-
9.Chitra Babarao Gangawane
Adv. V.R..Lahoti
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: 1100138/2015 Court Decision: The court acquitted all nine accused persons under IPC sections 494, 498-A, 506, and 34 on 04.05.2026. Key Facts: The complainant (wife) alleged that her husband (Accused 1) committed bigamy by remarrying while she was alive, and that he and eight family members (Accused 2-9) jointly subjected her to physical, mental, and financial harassment, extortion of dowry, and threats to coerce her into accepting the second marriage. The case involved allegations of demanding one lakh rupees as "return dowry," forcing her to surrender agricultural land, and threatening her with abandonment. Reasoning: The court found that although the complainant and her brother-witness testified about the alleged crimes, they had subsequently settled the matter with the accused outside court (noted on court record). The prosecution failed to produce sufficient independent corroborating evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the prosecution's case lacked the necessary strength to establish the offenses against any of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Disposed
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
20-Apr-2026
Arguments
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
06-Apr-2026
Arguments
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
16-Mar-2026
Arguments
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
07-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
17-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
03-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
21-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
31-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
30-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
02-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
23-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
17-Jun-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
06-May-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
29-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
27-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
03-Dec-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
23-Oct-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
13-Sep-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
23-Jul-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
10-Jun-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
30-Mar-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
07-Feb-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
03-Jan-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
27-Nov-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
01-Nov-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
04-Oct-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
15-Sep-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
22-Aug-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
02-Aug-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
11-Jul-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
13-Jun-2023
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
21-Apr-2023
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
20-Mar-2023
N.B.W._Ready
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
27-Feb-2023
N.B.W._Ready
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
07-Feb-2023
N.B.W._Ready
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
11-Jan-2023
N.B.W._Ready
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
16-Dec-2022
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
04-Nov-2022
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
06-Sep-2022
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
27-Jul-2022
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
15-Jun-2022
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
29-Apr-2022
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
23-Mar-2022
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
14-Feb-2022
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
10-Jan-2022
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
13-Dec-2021
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
29-Oct-2021
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
01-Oct-2021
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
07-Sep-2021
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
30-Jul-2021
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
28-Jun-2021
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
07-May-2021
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
10-Feb-2021
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
18-Jan-2021
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
20-Dec-2020
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
03-Sep-2020
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
22-Jun-2020
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
08-May-2020
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
27-Mar-2020
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
18-Feb-2020
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
10-Jan-2020
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
06-Dec-2019
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
23-Sep-2019
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
16-Sep-2019
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
26-Aug-2019
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
07-Aug-2019
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
01-Aug-2019
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
16-Jul-2019
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
30-Apr-2019
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
12-Mar-2019
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
05-Jan-2019
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
29-Oct-2018
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
09-Oct-2018
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
24-Aug-2018
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
25-Jul-2018
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
02-Jul-2018
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
21-May-2018
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
10-Apr-2018
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
26-Mar-2018
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
21-Feb-2018
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
16-Jan-2018
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
07-Dec-2017
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
06-Nov-2017
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
04-Oct-2017
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
11-Sep-2017
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
09-Aug-2017
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
21-Jun-2017
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
26-Apr-2017
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
24-Mar-2017
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
27-Jan-2017
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
21-Dec-2016
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
19-Nov-2016
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
05-Oct-2016
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
26-Jul-2016
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
10-Jun-2016
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
18-May-2016
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
30-Mar-2016
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
08-Feb-2016
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
18-Dec-2015
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
26-Oct-2015
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
07-Sep-2015
Evidence
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.m.f.c.malegaon
-
05-Aug-2015
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Aug-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 1100138/2015
Case Summary: 1100138/2015 Court Decision: The court acquitted all nine accused persons under IPC sections 494, 498-A, 506, and 34 on 04.05.2026. Key Facts: The complainant (wife) alleged that her husband (Accused 1) committed bigamy by remarrying while she was alive, and that he and eight family members (Accused 2-9) jointly subjected her to physical, mental, and financial harassment, extortion of dowry, and threats to coerce her into accepting the second marriage. The case involved allegations of demanding one lakh rupees as "return dowry," forcing her to surrender agricultural land, and threatening her with abandonment. Reasoning: The court found that although the complainant and her brother-witness testified about the alleged crimes, they had subsequently settled the matter with the accused outside court (noted on court record). The prosecution failed to produce sufficient independent corroborating evidence to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the prosecution's case lacked the necessary strength to establish the offenses against any of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts